Efficacy of the Tent-Pole Technique in Horizontal Ridge Augmentation

Doan, Tu Lam; Lê, Lánh Đức

doi:10.1590/pboci.2020.109

Cited by 4 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In our case, tent pole method was used in maxillary region and 6.8 mm vertical bone gain was obtained. It was more new bone gain were obtained than El Fattah et.al 9 results. The new bone formation difference could be explaining xenograft application.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 69%

Maksillada İki Farklı Ogmentasyon Tekniğinin Karşılaştırılması: Olgu Sunumu

ARI,

ADİLOĞLU

2024

ADO Klinik Bilimler Dergisi

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim: Dental implant applications are most common treatment methods for rehabilitation of edentulous jaws. The severe bone deficiency could not be allowed implant therapies. Various augmentation methods could be used for reconsruction. In this case report tent-pole and onlay grafting techniques were performed in case at edentulous maxilla with radiological evaluation at 6 months follow-up. Materials and Methods: CBCT (Cone beam computed tomography) were obtained from patient. Extraction of all teeth and explantation of 2 implants were planned because of periodontal problems. The ramus onlay grafting was decided to apply for both anterior side of the maxilla and tent pole technique for right premolar area of maxilla. Results: It was observed 3.5 mm horizontal bone gain at the right maxillary anterior side, 4.8 mm horizontal bone gain at the left maxillary anterior side and 3.4 mm horizontal and 6.8 mm vertical bone gain at right premolar side after 6 months. Conclusion: Tent pole and onlay grafting methods are successful treatment options for alveolar ridge augmentation. Nevertheless, autografts could not be enough in every case. In this situation, xenografts and allografts applications with tent pole technique could be preferred as an effective method for alveolar ridge augmentation both horizontally and vertically.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 69%

Maksillada İki Farklı Ogmentasyon Tekniğinin Karşılaştırılması: Olgu Sunumu

ARI,

ADİLOĞLU

2024

ADO Klinik Bilimler Dergisi

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The BP membrane is known for its excellent tensile strength and mechanical properties [ 23 , 24 ]. These membranes with different characteristics have shown consistent osteogenic efficacy in animal models and clinical trials [ 21 , 25 , 26 ]. However, these data primarily arise from clinical observations and studies of a membrane in isolation of other membranes, not from a comparison between different membranes.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Physical, mechanical, and biological properties of collagen membranes for guided bone regeneration: a comparative in vitro study

Shi

Tian

et al. 2023

BMC Oral Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background To provide a reference for clinical selection of collagen membranes by analyzing the properties of three kinds of collagen membranes widely used in clinics: Bio-Gide membrane from porcine dermis (PD), Heal-All membrane from bovine dermis (BD), and Lyoplant membrane from bovine pericardium (BP). Methods The barrier function of three kinds of collagen membranes were evaluated by testing the surface morphology, mechanical properties, hydrophilicity, and degradation rate of collagen membranes in collagenase and artificial saliva. In addition, the bioactivity of each collagen membrane as well as the proliferation and osteogenesis of MC3T3-E1 cells were evaluated. Mass spectrometry was also used to analyze the degradation products. Results The BP membrane had the highest tensile strength and Young’s modulus as well as the largest water contact angle. The PD membrane exhibited the highest elongation at break, the smallest water contact angle, and the lowest degradation weight loss. The BD membrane had the highest degradation weight loss, the highest number of proteins in its degradation product, the strongest effect on the proliferation of MC3T3-E1 cells, and the highest expression level of osteogenic genes. Conclusions The PD membrane is the best choice for shaping and maintenance time, while the BD membrane is good for osteogenesis, and the BP membrane is suitable for spatial maintenance. To meet the clinical requirements of guided bone regeneration, using two different kinds of collagen membranes concurrently to exert their respective advantages is an option worth considering.

show abstract

“…[ 18 ] The tent pole technique, in combination with resorbable collagen membranes and screws, offers a predictable approach with easy manipulation and fewer complications. [ 19 ] Doan and Le, in their study, found that it is an effective method for increasing the horizontal ridge dimension and facilitating subsequent implant placement. [ 19 ] The method plays an important role in bone growth and reduces graft material resorption.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…[ 19 ] Doan and Le, in their study, found that it is an effective method for increasing the horizontal ridge dimension and facilitating subsequent implant placement. [ 19 ] The method plays an important role in bone growth and reduces graft material resorption. This can be attributed to the fact that bone formation is till the head of the screws or even covers it as in our cases.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%