2013
DOI: 10.1590/s2179-975x2013005000004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of substratum surface roughness on periphytic algal community structure in a shallow tropical reservoir

Abstract: Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the algal periphytic community structure on substrates with differing surface roughness in early and longer-term colonization; Methods: Periphyton was sampled after 30 days (June 24 to July 24, 2008) and 5 days (July 07 to July 12, 2010) substrate exposure during dry season. Plastic slides were used as artificial substrate. Treatments were smooth surface (control), low roughness, medium roughness and high roughness. Samples were collected for limnological condition and periphy… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(41 reference statements)
0
10
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The richest assemblage was obtained from Polygonum hydropiperoides (natural substrate), 77 species, and can be explained by the glabrous or pubescent petiole of this macrophyte (Melo 2008), which offers a greater architectural complexity than the smooth and uniform surface of glass slides. The roughness difference between substrates usually does not contribute to an increase in algal biomass, but it is an important factor in selecting the species composition of the periphyton (Burkholder 1996, Souza & Ferragut 2012.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The richest assemblage was obtained from Polygonum hydropiperoides (natural substrate), 77 species, and can be explained by the glabrous or pubescent petiole of this macrophyte (Melo 2008), which offers a greater architectural complexity than the smooth and uniform surface of glass slides. The roughness difference between substrates usually does not contribute to an increase in algal biomass, but it is an important factor in selecting the species composition of the periphyton (Burkholder 1996, Souza & Ferragut 2012.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This strategy contributes to diatoms representativeness in the periphytic community (Round et al 1990, Lowe 1996. The species composition of periphytic assemblages can be influenced by the substrate micro-topography (Murdock andDodds 2007, Souza &Ferragut 2012). Inventories using substrates with different surface types usually hold a great algal diversity (Ács et al 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the development of benthic diatoms such as P. laevis is influenced by the properties of the substratum. For example, benthic diatoms assemblages have been found to grow better on rougher surfaces (Souza & Ferragut, 2012). This impact of surface roughness on periphytic assemblage growth can affect the comparability between different surfaces.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its more complex morphology and life habit differs from other macrophytes (e.g., E. azurea and N. amazonum), because both apparently present more similar morphology of the petioles. Furthermore, leaves of O. cubense present a parallel innervation that can increase the spatial heterogeneity providing distinctive microhabitat for algal colonization (Souza and Ferragut, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%