2010
DOI: 10.1590/s2179-83972010000400006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Utilização do acesso radial elimina a ocorrência de sangramento grave relacionado ao sítio de punção após intervenção coronária percutânea primária

Abstract: 50% em 88,5%, com taxa de crossover de 1,5%. A mortalidade hospitalar foi de 4,5% e a taxa de sangramento grave foi de 1%, sendo um episódio de hemorragia digestiva alta e uma queda de hemoglobina de 5 g/dl. As complicações vasculares relacionadas ao sítio de punção limitaram-se a três casos de hematoma tipo II e a dois casos de hematoma tipo III, sem repercussão clínica e com resolução espontânea. CONCLUSÃO: O acesso radial representa uma via eficaz e segura para a realização de intervenção coronária percutân… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
1
0
7

Year Published

2011
2011
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
1
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, the need to change approa ches occurred in less than 3% of the cases and no excessive durations or increased material usage were observed, which reflects the importance of experience and familiarity with the procedure to the final results. [16][17][18] Similar findings were reported in a recent subanalysis of the Harmonizing Outcomes with Revascularization and Stents (HORIZONS-AMI) study, in which, compared to the femoral approach, the radial approach was associated with lower rates of severe bleeding, reinfarction, and 30-day and 1-year mortality, with similar procedure durations, fluoroscopy times, and door-balloon times. 19 Therefore, the radial technique represents a complementary strategy to reduce haemorrhagic complications in the elderly when combined with the following: judicious choice of anti-thrombotic therapy using the minimum effective dose and promoting adjustments when needed; administration of medication in the shortest time possible; and the attempt to achieve fine equilibrium between safety and efficacy.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…In this study, the need to change approa ches occurred in less than 3% of the cases and no excessive durations or increased material usage were observed, which reflects the importance of experience and familiarity with the procedure to the final results. [16][17][18] Similar findings were reported in a recent subanalysis of the Harmonizing Outcomes with Revascularization and Stents (HORIZONS-AMI) study, in which, compared to the femoral approach, the radial approach was associated with lower rates of severe bleeding, reinfarction, and 30-day and 1-year mortality, with similar procedure durations, fluoroscopy times, and door-balloon times. 19 Therefore, the radial technique represents a complementary strategy to reduce haemorrhagic complications in the elderly when combined with the following: judicious choice of anti-thrombotic therapy using the minimum effective dose and promoting adjustments when needed; administration of medication in the shortest time possible; and the attempt to achieve fine equilibrium between safety and efficacy.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…16 The Acute Catheterisation and Urgent Intervention Triage strategY (ACUITY) study has demonstrated that the transradial approach reduces the rate of major bleeding compared to femoral access in patients with acute coronary syndromes (3% vs. 8.4%; P = 0.03). 17 Finally, in Brazil, Andrade et al 18 published a study with consecutive patients who underwent primary PCI through radial access and demonstrated that the performance of this procedure by experienced surgeons is safe, with a virtual absence of severe vascular complications related to the puncture site, findings that were reproduced in our study.…”
supporting
confidence: 73%
“…11 Esses resultados foram encontrados apenas entre os operadores com maior experiência no acesso radial (400 casos/ano). Em nosso meio, publicações de Andrade et al 12 e do nosso grupo 13 reproduziram os benefícios da opção pelo acesso radial na ICP primária.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified