2012
DOI: 10.1590/s2179-64912012000200004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perceived dysphonia by the clinician's and patient's viewpoint

Abstract: The clinician's perception does correspond to the individual's self-perception of his/her vocal quality and the impact of a voice deviation on his/her quality of life, but not directly. The individual's perception about his/her vocal quality and voice-related quality of life complements the clinician's perception regarding the overall degree of the voice deviation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The impact the individuals with voice issues suffer in several areas of their lives is evident. Therefore, it is key that protocols to measure these impacts be widely used scientifically and clinically to more specifically approach emotional and functional aspects (28)(29)(30) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The impact the individuals with voice issues suffer in several areas of their lives is evident. Therefore, it is key that protocols to measure these impacts be widely used scientifically and clinically to more specifically approach emotional and functional aspects (28)(29)(30) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second theory is that impaired central auditory processing of complex communication sounds associated with chronic voice impairment in UVFP inactivates feedback error computation altogether or creates a fixed feedback error signal that no longer drives motoric programs of compensatory vocal output. Both theories may partially explain why the correlation between clinician‐rated and patient‐reported voice quality is modest . Surgical intervention for UVFP often restores voice quality to a satisfactory rating based on clinician‐centric instruments and objective acoustical measures, yet certain treated patients are somewhat dissatisfied despite “successful” surgical intervention …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both theories may partially explain why the correlation between clinician-rated and patient-reported voice quality is modest. [35][36][37][38] Surgical intervention for UVFP often restores voice quality to a satisfactory rating based on clinician-centric instruments and objective acoustical measures, [39][40][41] yet certain treated patients are somewhat dissatisfied despite "successful" surgical intervention. 6,8,[42][43][44][45][46] Discovery of central auditory processing impairment in UVFP has immediate diagnostic and treatment implications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A previous study found the relationship between the evaluation of the speech-language pathologist and the vocal self-assessment and the impact of dysphonia on a quality of life among 48 individuals complaining voice-altering, aged of 51 years old, and 48 without vocal complaints and healthy voice, age of 46 years. They concluded that the perception of the subject on his own voice and the impact of dysphonia on their quality of life complement the perception of clinicians in relation to the general degree of this change (28) . The limitations of this study, highlighted by the reduced adhesion of Prosecutors taking part on the research and, consequently size of the sample, plus the lack of research on the subject area for data comparison.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%