2011
DOI: 10.1590/s1984-63982011000200011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Holistic corpus-based dialectology

Abstract: This paper is concerned with sketching future directions for corpusbased dialectology. We advocate a holistic approach to the study of geographically conditioned linguistic variability, and we present a suitable methodology, 'corpusbased dialectometry', in exactly this spirit. Specifically, we argue that in order to live up to the potential of the corpus-based method, practitioners need to (i) abandon their exclusive focus on individual linguistic features in favor of the study of feature aggregates, (ii) draw… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The resulting boxy shapes are in biology often interpreted as being indicative of horizontal gene transfer and in linguistics as suggesting language contact. We skip further technicalities and refer the reader to the introduction in Szmrecsanyi and Wolk (2011:574–577). Suffice it to say that we present neighbor-net diagrams without insisting on a strictly phylogenetic interpretation.…”
Section: Quantitative Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resulting boxy shapes are in biology often interpreted as being indicative of horizontal gene transfer and in linguistics as suggesting language contact. We skip further technicalities and refer the reader to the introduction in Szmrecsanyi and Wolk (2011:574–577). Suffice it to say that we present neighbor-net diagrams without insisting on a strictly phylogenetic interpretation.…”
Section: Quantitative Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, given thatas we have seenlanguage grouping in classificatory linguistics is intended to reflect systematic, pervasive change, researchers have increasingly questioned classifications that rely on linguistic traits selected a priori. While being a practical necessity in traditional comparative dialectology, the selection of a limited number of specific traits necessarily involves subjective judgements 2005;Starostin, 2010;Szmrecsanyi & Wolk, 2011), and may result in erroneous classifications as the pre-selected traits become overly influential in the final analysis. In keeping with this view, this paper aims to contribute to the development of an empirically-based classification of Gallo-Italic through the use of dialectometry applied to atlas corpora, and specifically through the measurement of Levenshtein distance.…”
Section: Classificatory Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…C orpus-based dialectometry (henceforth: CBDM), then, combines the study of dialectometric research questions with corpus-linguistic methodologies. CBDM utilizes aggregation methodologies to explore quantitative and distributional usage patterns extracted from dialect corpora (see Szmrecsanyi, 2008, 2011, 2013; Szmrecsanyi & Wolk, 2011; Wolk, 2014; Wolk & Szmrecsanyi, 2016). Turning to corpora enables analysts to address questions about usage versus knowledge, production/comprehension versus intuition, chaos versus orderliness, and so on.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%