The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2018
DOI: 10.1017/jlg.2018.6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Probabilistic corpus-based dialectometry

Abstract: Researchers in dialectometry have begun to explore measurements based on fundamentally quantitative metrics, often sourced from dialect corpora, as an alternative to the traditional signals derived from dialect atlases. This change of data type amplifies an existing issue in the classical paradigm, namely that locations may vary in coverage and that this affects the distance measurements: pairs involving a locat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 42 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although, in comparison to atlases, they reveal more about the context and magnitude in which linguistic features are used, they come with their own issues. One problem is that the frequencies of the collected features typically need to be normalized to be comparable enough for dialectometrical analysis (Wolk & Szmrecsanyi, 2018). In the current work, we aim to surpass the issue by using transcribed interview data directly, without explicitly defining a list of features beforehand.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although, in comparison to atlases, they reveal more about the context and magnitude in which linguistic features are used, they come with their own issues. One problem is that the frequencies of the collected features typically need to be normalized to be comparable enough for dialectometrical analysis (Wolk & Szmrecsanyi, 2018). In the current work, we aim to surpass the issue by using transcribed interview data directly, without explicitly defining a list of features beforehand.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%