2011
DOI: 10.1590/s1984-29612011000400015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of destruxin A on Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus ticks (Acari: Ixodidae)

Abstract: This study evaluated the effects of destruxin A on Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus females, since this toxin is one of the likely causes of high mortality induced by the entomopathogenic fungus Metarhizium anisopliae in arthropods. Ticks were immersed or inoculated with different concentrations of destruxin A. Despite the doses applied, there were no deaths or significant alterations in oviposition between the groups treated with destruxin A and the control groups. No other external effect caused by destru… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(14 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This in agreement with Moon et al (2008) who found that M. acridum has very low destruxin production even though this isolate is very effective against grasshopper/ locust. Moreover, Golo et al (2011) found that different concentrations of destruxin A did not cause any effect on engorged female of R. microplus. Additionally, Fernandes et al (2012) concluded that the fungal production of toxic metabolites might not be crucial for pathogenicity to arthropods, including ticks.…”
Section: March 2018 | Volume 6 | Issue 3 | Page 145mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…This in agreement with Moon et al (2008) who found that M. acridum has very low destruxin production even though this isolate is very effective against grasshopper/ locust. Moreover, Golo et al (2011) found that different concentrations of destruxin A did not cause any effect on engorged female of R. microplus. Additionally, Fernandes et al (2012) concluded that the fungal production of toxic metabolites might not be crucial for pathogenicity to arthropods, including ticks.…”
Section: March 2018 | Volume 6 | Issue 3 | Page 145mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…This tick species secrete toxins which produce positive inotropic responses in rat left ventricular papillary muscles and positive contractile responses in rat thoracic aortic rings [34]. Destruxin A secreted by Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus ticks (Acari: Ixodidae) causes tetanic paralysis [35]. Tick secrete a highly paralytic and lethal venom cocktail of proteinaceous molecules contain neurotoxins HT-1, present in the saliva ticks despite several species possessing saliva of the Australian paralysis tick [36] (table 3).…”
Section: Tick-borne Paralysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to note that not all EPF populations have the same capacity to produce all the enzymes or toxins reported in the scientific literature (Schrank and Vainstein, 2010), neither in variety nor in quantity. For example, in R. microplus, the immersion or inoculation of dextruxin A from M. anisopliae on engorged ticks neither affected their biological parameters nor caused paralysis (Golo et al, 2011); but other study reported an acaricidal effect of distinct destruxins from Beauveria feline against R. microplus (Morais-Urano et al, 2012). In addition, different environmental and nutritional factors have been identified as the main triggers of the genetic expression of these components (Campos et al, 2005;Fang et al, 2005).…”
Section: Fungal Growth and Death Of The Hostmentioning
confidence: 99%