2007
DOI: 10.1590/s1981-77462007000100002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Os significados do trabalho: produção de valores como produção semiótica no capitalismo informacional

Abstract: Re su mo Em qualquer indústria, os processos de trabalho tornaram-se, no capitalismo avançado, essencialmente semióticos, isto é, o trabalhador, ao longo da cadeia produtiva que vem desde a engenharia até o ajuste e controle das máquinas, é empregado para processar informações às quais pode atribuir significados relacionados às suas situações concretas de trabalho. A compreensão desse processo ajuda a entender o conceito marxiano de trabalho concreto e pode contribuir para uma melhor compreensão da natureza do… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In In case of further theoretical debates about professional training and job market, these three events are related to the studies of political economy of Communication, according to Ramos and Santos (2007), Dantas (2007), W. D. Braga (2007), Rebouças (2005) and Bolaño (2000). It is not our intention to analyze these events from a legal point of view.…”
Section: The Debate About the Regulation Of Journalism Training And Pmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In In case of further theoretical debates about professional training and job market, these three events are related to the studies of political economy of Communication, according to Ramos and Santos (2007), Dantas (2007), W. D. Braga (2007), Rebouças (2005) and Bolaño (2000). It is not our intention to analyze these events from a legal point of view.…”
Section: The Debate About the Regulation Of Journalism Training And Pmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under certain circumstances, these reactions could be considered productive within the framework of capitalist norms since they allow for the anticipation of problems (based on workers' know-how and experience) or even improve productivity (perhaps even consciously when workers try to find ways to escape from the monotony of the job and innovate their own work). Thanks to computerised automation this know-how is increasingly directed towards labour involving communication between people or between people and machines -the collaborative observation and control of the productive process by means of 'combined work' (Marx, 1984, 1 (2), Chapter 15) that can only function as combined work by means of interaction and communication (Dantas, 2007). However in order to accomplish its part in the process, this work must also be collaborative with the capitalist institution itself:…”
Section: A Combination Of Toyotism and Taylorismmentioning
confidence: 99%