2021
DOI: 10.1590/s1980-657420210000227
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How to prepare a systematic review and meta-analysis: the methodological approach

Abstract: This article aimed to provide to the authors a summary of the methodological approach to prepare a systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods. The instructions were established to support authors in preparing systematic reviews and meta-analyses, according to the required recommendations. Conclusion.The researchers should keep in mind that conduct a systematic review involves rigorous methodological criteria to identify and synthesize all relevant studies on a given topic defined a priori.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
(3 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This review was prepared in accordance with the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions [8] and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses PRISMA Statement 2020 [9]. It was based on the methodological instructions for the preparation of a systematic review and meta-analysis proposed by Martimbianco [10]. The review protocol was registered with PROSPERO (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews), nº CRD42021259733.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This review was prepared in accordance with the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions [8] and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses PRISMA Statement 2020 [9]. It was based on the methodological instructions for the preparation of a systematic review and meta-analysis proposed by Martimbianco [10]. The review protocol was registered with PROSPERO (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews), nº CRD42021259733.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%