2021
DOI: 10.1590/s1980-657420210000200
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What are the challenges of epidemiological research during the COVID-19 pandemic?

Abstract: The COVID-19 pandemic had an impact in several areas, and in scientific research was not different. Researchers are working from their homes since research facilities and universities were closed, and face-to-face interaction where limited to stop the virus spread. This brought a lot of changes in observational studies, especially in epidemiology research. Since most studies are being conducted through internet-based assessments, researchers are facing different challenges regarding data collection and partici… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(7 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, because of COVID-19 pandemic, face-to-face data collection were not allowed by ethics boards when data were collected. Thus, sampling bias cannot be ruled since internet-based surveys does not enable an equiprobable sampling since participants with low economic status are less likely to have internet access [38]. Second, the assessment of some outcomes such as disability was hampered due to online data collection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, because of COVID-19 pandemic, face-to-face data collection were not allowed by ethics boards when data were collected. Thus, sampling bias cannot be ruled since internet-based surveys does not enable an equiprobable sampling since participants with low economic status are less likely to have internet access [38]. Second, the assessment of some outcomes such as disability was hampered due to online data collection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though wearable devices may address any self-report bias concern, they also have their limitations such as wear time and device validity [ 36 , 37 ]. Third, as previously stated, our sample has a high proportion of participants with an academic degree, thus, selection bias is an issue since less educated people have limited access to internet [ 38 ]. Thus, one must be cautions to extrapolate our findings on PA trajectory to the whole population, since PA levels are different across schooling levels of Brazilians.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, our study had an extensive questionnaire which are associated with higher non-response rate. Thus, we opted for a simplified measure of PA [ 38 ]. However, one feature of our study stands out, we tracked PA behaviour from pre-COVID-19 levels into 10 months of social restrictions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is noteworthy that this method was common practice in developing countries during the pandemic, where face-toface interviews are not recommended; thus, the results should be interpreted with caution. 62 Moreover, pharmacists were explicitly asked to answer about their perception of competency upon graduation. However, respondents could have misunderstood this concept; thus, recall bias is also possible, particularly for pharmacists who graduated before 2009.…”
Section: Strengths and Limitations Of The Studymentioning
confidence: 99%