2017
DOI: 10.1590/s1808-185120171601162779
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability of the Ao Classification of Thoracolumbar Fractures Compared to Tlics and Magerl

Abstract: Objective: To test the reliability of the new AO/2013 classification compared with AO/Magerl and TLICS. Methods: Four spine surgeons retrospectively and blindly evaluated imaging and clinical data from 98 patients with thoracolumbar fractures. Results: Using the Kappa coefficient, we obtained the best reproducibility for the AO/2013 classification compared to the other two, represented by Kappa coefficient of 0.690. We could also obtain, with good reproducibility among the evaluators (Kappa 0.690), the most co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In turn, contrary to the present results ( k = 0.59), the AOSpine classification presented a good inter-observer agreement ( k = 0.62). 17 Azimi et al 18 also observed excellent k -values (from 0.83 to 0.89) in the intra- and inter-observer assessment using the AOSpine classification.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…In turn, contrary to the present results ( k = 0.59), the AOSpine classification presented a good inter-observer agreement ( k = 0.62). 17 Azimi et al 18 also observed excellent k -values (from 0.83 to 0.89) in the intra- and inter-observer assessment using the AOSpine classification.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Costa Marques та співавт. [77]. Дослідники проаналізували міжекспертну відтворюваність результатів обстеження 98 пацієнтів, ранжованих за допомогою трьох різних класифікацій, зокрема F. Magerl та співавт.…”
Section: авториunclassified