2016
DOI: 10.1590/s1808-185120161503162720
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In Which Patients Is It Possible to Perform Standalone Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Without Cage Subsidence?

Abstract: Objective: To identify the factors related to the non-occurrence of cage subsidence in standalone lateral lumbar interbody fusion procedures. Methods: Case-control study of single level standalone lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) including 86 cases. Patients without cage subsidence composed the control group (C), while those in the subsidence group (S) developed cage subsidence. Preoperative data were examined to create a risk score based on correlation factors with S group. The proven risk factors were … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6,15 While there are potential benefits to stand-alone LLIF that have encouraged clinicians to use this approach to manage ASD, some complications should also be consid-In another study, Marchi et al tried to identify which patients may undergo the stand-alone procedure without cage subsidence and created a score with risk factors, considering age over 61, female gender, and the presence of spondylolisthesis and scoliosis as the main determinant factors. 16 With the technological advances and the less invasive approaches, at least 2 disruptive alternatives have emerged to make the posterior-based pedicle screw fixation additional to LLIF possible, without the need to flip the patient for a different decubitus: single-position surgery in lateral and prone position. They involve inserting percutaneous pedicle screws with the patient in a lateral position or performing the LLIF in prone position.…”
Section: Literature Search Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…6,15 While there are potential benefits to stand-alone LLIF that have encouraged clinicians to use this approach to manage ASD, some complications should also be consid-In another study, Marchi et al tried to identify which patients may undergo the stand-alone procedure without cage subsidence and created a score with risk factors, considering age over 61, female gender, and the presence of spondylolisthesis and scoliosis as the main determinant factors. 16 With the technological advances and the less invasive approaches, at least 2 disruptive alternatives have emerged to make the posterior-based pedicle screw fixation additional to LLIF possible, without the need to flip the patient for a different decubitus: single-position surgery in lateral and prone position. They involve inserting percutaneous pedicle screws with the patient in a lateral position or performing the LLIF in prone position.…”
Section: Literature Search Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23 Overall, patient-related factors (bone quality, age older than 60 years, smoking status, high demand levels, female gender, spondylolisthesis, and scoliosis) and technicalrelated factors (intraoperative end plate violation, smaller cages, apophyseal ring contact of the implants, material of the cage, and type of graft used) combine to determine the outcomes of stand-alone LLIF. [5][6][7][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]…”
Section: Literature Search Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%