2010
DOI: 10.1590/s1807-59322010000900013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Episodes of falling among elderly people: a systematic review and meta-analysis of social and demographic pre-disposing characteristics

Abstract: CONTEXT:The multifactorial nature of falls among elderly people is well-known. Identifying the social-demographic characteristics of elderly people who fall would enable us to define the typical profile of the elderly who are at risk of falling.OBJECTIVE:We aimed to isolate studies in which the social-demographic risk factors for falls among the elderly have been evaluated and to carry out a meta-analysis by combining the results of all of these selected studies.METHOD:We did a systematic literature review usi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
55
0
5

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 142 publications
5
55
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Dependency in daily activities has previously been reported to be strongly associated with falling [21][22][23]. Other studies found pain-related interference with daily activities to be associated with falls, even after adjustment for several confounders [1,24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Dependency in daily activities has previously been reported to be strongly associated with falling [21][22][23]. Other studies found pain-related interference with daily activities to be associated with falls, even after adjustment for several confounders [1,24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Meta-analyses on drugs [19][20][21][22][23], muscle weakness [24], balance impairment [25], sociodemographic items [26] and fall risk in older persons have all been carried out. That said, the only meta-analysis performed on exercises aimed at preventing falls is quite recent and dealt only with randomised controlled trials (RCTs) [27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A systematic review of randomized controlled trials and observational studies showed that the presence of any difficulties with ADLs was associated with an increased risk of falling (for ADLs, OR 2.26, 95% CI 2.09-2.45; for instrumental ADLs, OR 2.10, 95% CI 1.68-2.64). 14 The social history should address the patient's living conditions, including various environment al factors and hazards, both indoors and outdoors, such as rugs, bathroom equipment, lighting, bath rails, clutter, wet surfaces, gait aids, assistive devices, weather conditions and footwear. One systematic review of cohort and cross-sectional studies showed an increased risk of falls in the presence of mobility aids in both the community (OR 2.07, 95% CI 1.59-2.71) and institutional settings such as retirement homes and long-term care facilities (OR 1.77, 95% CI 1.66-1.89).…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%