2010
DOI: 10.1590/s1807-03022010000200003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the global convergence of interior-pointnonlinear programming algorithms

Abstract: Abstract. Carathéodory's lemma states that if we have a linear combination of vectors inR n , we can rewrite this combination using a linearly independent subset. This lemma has been successfully applied in nonlinear optimization in many contexts. In this work we present a new version of this celebrated result, in which we obtained new bounds for the size of the coefficients in the linear combination and we provide examples where these bounds are useful. We show how these new bounds can be used to prove that t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(22 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…See also [19]. If one considers equality constraints in (NSDP) separately, one should employ an adapted version of Carathéodory's Lemma that fixes a particular subset of vectors, which can be found in [8,Lem.…”
Section: Reviewing Constant Rank-type Constraint Qualifications For Nlpmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…See also [19]. If one considers equality constraints in (NSDP) separately, one should employ an adapted version of Carathéodory's Lemma that fixes a particular subset of vectors, which can be found in [8,Lem.…”
Section: Reviewing Constant Rank-type Constraint Qualifications For Nlpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, due to the linearity of G, it is immediate to see that Robinson's CQ does not hold at x = 0. On the other hand, for any x ∈ R 2 and any orthogonal matrix E ∈ R 2×2 , note that regardless of the form of E as in (19), we have v11(x, E) = 0, v22(x, E) = 0, and…”
Section: G(x)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, it is natural to assume that the optimization problem satisfies a sufficient interior property, that is, that every local minimizer can be arbitrarily approximated by strictly feasible points. It is known from [16] that CPLD together with such sufficient interior property is equivalent to MFCQ. Hence, it is fruitless to use CPLD to generalize results based on MFCQ in the context of interior point methods.…”
Section: Interior Point Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%