2011
DOI: 10.1007/s10107-011-0456-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A relaxed constant positive linear dependence constraint qualification and applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
148
0
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 134 publications
(152 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
148
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…If (x 1 ,x 2 ) ∈ R n 1 × R n 2 is an equilibrium, and the constraints of the first problem in (1) with x 2 =x 2 satisfy an appropriate constraint qualification (CQ) [37] atx 1 , while the constraints of the second problem in (1) with x 1 =x 1 satisfy a CQ atx 2 , then there exists (μ 1 ,μ 2 ) ∈ R m × R m such that (x 1 ,x 2 ,μ 1 ,μ 2 ) solves (2). Conversely, if f 1 (·, x 2 ) and the components of g(·, x 2 ) are convex for each x 2 ∈ R n 2 , while f 2 (x 1 , ·) and the components of g(x 1 , ·) are convex for each x 1 ∈ R n 1 , then for every solution (x 1 ,x 2 ,μ 1 ,μ 2 ) of (2) it holds that (x 1 ,x 2 ) is an equilibrium. In particular, under the appropriate assumptions, by estimating the distance to the solution set of (2) one also estimates the distance to the solution set of GNEP (1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…If (x 1 ,x 2 ) ∈ R n 1 × R n 2 is an equilibrium, and the constraints of the first problem in (1) with x 2 =x 2 satisfy an appropriate constraint qualification (CQ) [37] atx 1 , while the constraints of the second problem in (1) with x 1 =x 1 satisfy a CQ atx 2 , then there exists (μ 1 ,μ 2 ) ∈ R m × R m such that (x 1 ,x 2 ,μ 1 ,μ 2 ) solves (2). Conversely, if f 1 (·, x 2 ) and the components of g(·, x 2 ) are convex for each x 2 ∈ R n 2 , while f 2 (x 1 , ·) and the components of g(x 1 , ·) are convex for each x 1 ∈ R n 1 , then for every solution (x 1 ,x 2 ,μ 1 ,μ 2 ) of (2) it holds that (x 1 ,x 2 ) is an equilibrium. In particular, under the appropriate assumptions, by estimating the distance to the solution set of (2) one also estimates the distance to the solution set of GNEP (1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, if f 1 (·, x 2 ) and the components of g(·, x 2 ) are convex for each x 2 ∈ R n 2 , while f 2 (x 1 , ·) and the components of g(x 1 , ·) are convex for each x 1 ∈ R n 1 , then for every solution (x 1 ,x 2 ,μ 1 ,μ 2 ) of (2) it holds that (x 1 ,x 2 ) is an equilibrium. In particular, under the appropriate assumptions, by estimating the distance to the solution set of (2) one also estimates the distance to the solution set of GNEP (1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Taking this point of view, it appears very natural to combine sSQP with the usual augmented Lagrangian algorithm. One reason is that Aug-L methods are very robust and have good convergence properties [2,3,7], including when applied to degenerate problems [13,33]. Moreover, it is known that sSQP and Aug-L methods are related: in a sense, the former can be considered as linearization of the iterative subproblems of the latter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We refer to [3] and [13,25] for state-of-the-art on global and local convergence properties of Aug-L methods, respectively. For many other issues, see [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%