2011
DOI: 10.1590/s1806-83242011000100002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low shrinkage composite resins: influence on sealing ability in unfavorable C-factor cavities

Abstract: The present investigation observed the sealing ability of low shrinkage composite resins in large and deep cavities, placed and photocured in one increment. Large, deep cavities (5.0 mm diameter and 2.5 mm deep) surrounded by enamel were prepared in bovine teeth, which were then divided into five groups. Groups

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(29 reference statements)
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The composite was inserted into the mold and immediately covered with two glass slides from the top and the bottom. The specimen was polymerized by light, using an LED (Demi LED Light Curing System, Kerr Corp., Orange, USA) light-curing unit with a light intensity of 800 mW/cm 2 , measured with a radiometer for 60 s from both sides. All of the samples were polished with 600, 800, and 1200 grit SiC papers (991A Softlex, Berlin, Germany) to obtain highly polished samples with identical surface roughness (Ra) values.…”
Section: Specimen Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The composite was inserted into the mold and immediately covered with two glass slides from the top and the bottom. The specimen was polymerized by light, using an LED (Demi LED Light Curing System, Kerr Corp., Orange, USA) light-curing unit with a light intensity of 800 mW/cm 2 , measured with a radiometer for 60 s from both sides. All of the samples were polished with 600, 800, and 1200 grit SiC papers (991A Softlex, Berlin, Germany) to obtain highly polished samples with identical surface roughness (Ra) values.…”
Section: Specimen Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3] These restorative materials have been introduced in an attempt to overcome the polymerization shrinkage of conventional methacrylate-based composites. A low potential to absorb the dyes from daily nutrition is considered to be an advantage of silorane-based restoratives because of their siloxane backbone, which is responsible for the hydrophobic nature of the restorative material.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lack of proper marginal sealing leads to water/saliva infiltration, which can contaminate the mineralized dental tissues involved in the cavity preparation. 16,17 To improve the sealing ability of one-step self-etching adhesives, some authors have suggested the application of an additional layer of hydrophobic material in an attempt to reduce the concentration of hydrophilic monomers to be light cured. 9,[18][19][20][21][22] The importance of studying dentin permeability in relation to the sealing ability of adhesive systems is that, besides bonding the restorative material to the tooth, adhesive systems are responsible for sealing the resin-dentin interface against microleakage and avoiding restorative material debonding, which could compromise the restorations.…”
Section: Declaration Of Interestsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9,[18][19][20][21][22] The importance of studying dentin permeability in relation to the sealing ability of adhesive systems is that, besides bonding the restorative material to the tooth, adhesive systems are responsible for sealing the resin-dentin interface against microleakage and avoiding restorative material debonding, which could compromise the restorations. 2,16,17 The objective of this study was to measure fluid flow through the adhesive-dentin interfaces created by eight bonding agents using a permeability device. The null hypothesis was that the mode of application of the adhesives has no effect on dentin permeability.…”
Section: Declaration Of Interestsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinical variables include material manipulation and insertion techniques, isolation constraints (usage of dental rubber dam), and adequate knowledge of adhesive and composite resin science and applicable technique. [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] Composite resin, used as a posterior restorative, is significantly influenced by polymerization shrinkage with amounts ranging from 1.5% to 5%. 11 Shrinkage causes debonding of the material from tooth structure, precipitating clinical and radiographic sequelae including marginal staining and micro-gap formation (approximately 10 to 20 lm).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%