2011
DOI: 10.1590/s1678-91992011000300015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of different diagnostic tests in dogs uninfected and naturally infected with visceral leishmaniasis

Abstract: Abstract:Uninfected dogs (n = 10) and those naturally infected with leishmaniasis (n = 10) were subjected to several diagnostic tests, namely: hemoculture, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) of hemoculture, indirect immunofluorescence (RIFI), cytological examination of lymph node aspirate, culture of lymph node aspirate and PCR of lymph node aspirate. RIFI -followed by PCR of lymph node aspirate culture -presented more positive results in infected dogs than in uninfected ones. In infected animals, RIFI was more e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The positivity of animals observed here was higher than those obtained in epidemiological surveys carried out in other states, such as Bahia (Rodrigues et al 2020 ), Mato Grosso (Carvalho et al 2020 ), Minas Gerais (Castro-Júnior et al 2014 ), and São Paulo (Julião et al 2007 ). These results may be related to the diversity of biological samples and laboratory tests used in our study, which may allow an increase in the rates of sensitivity for the LC diagnosis (Sassaki et al 2011 ; Braz et al 2016 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The positivity of animals observed here was higher than those obtained in epidemiological surveys carried out in other states, such as Bahia (Rodrigues et al 2020 ), Mato Grosso (Carvalho et al 2020 ), Minas Gerais (Castro-Júnior et al 2014 ), and São Paulo (Julião et al 2007 ). These results may be related to the diversity of biological samples and laboratory tests used in our study, which may allow an increase in the rates of sensitivity for the LC diagnosis (Sassaki et al 2011 ; Braz et al 2016 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%