2010
DOI: 10.1590/s1678-77572010000500011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of two morphometric methods of bone loss percentages caused by periodontitis in rats in different locations

Abstract: ObjectiveThe present study evaluated morphometrically bone loss percentages in experimental periodontitis in rats, comparing different locations (lingual mandible, palatal maxilla and buccal maxilla) and two evaluation methods (distance and area methods).Material and MethodsLigatures were placed around the maxillary right second molar and around the mandibular right first molar in 14 female Wistar rats. The contralateral molars served as intragroup controls. After 4 weeks, the rats were sacrificed and their ma… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
16
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…20 Morphometric and histologic procedures were compared for alveolar bone measurement, and no significant differences were found between the two methods when the amount of bone was measured after ligature placement in rats. 21 A recent study 22 morphometrically evaluated bone loss by comparing different locations in experimental periodontitis in rats. The maxilla showed greater bone loss than the mandible, and the bone loss was greater on the buccal side.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 Morphometric and histologic procedures were compared for alveolar bone measurement, and no significant differences were found between the two methods when the amount of bone was measured after ligature placement in rats. 21 A recent study 22 morphometrically evaluated bone loss by comparing different locations in experimental periodontitis in rats. The maxilla showed greater bone loss than the mandible, and the bone loss was greater on the buccal side.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used a method described by Souza et al . (34) and Kuhr et al . (35) to quantify the area under the cementum‐enamel junction (CEJ), reflecting periodontal bone loss.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Several methods have been applied to assess periodontal bone loss in rats through morphometric [7,8,10,11,17,18], radiographic *Statistically significant (ANOVA and Tukey test; p < 0.05) in columns. [7,19], and histologic [12] or histometric [9] analyses applied to jaws.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%