2010
DOI: 10.1590/s1678-77572010000400014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of aquatine endodontic cleanser on smear layer removal in the root canals of ex vivo human teeth

Abstract: ObjectivesThe purpose of this study was to measure and compare the root canal cleanliness and smear layer removal effectiveness of Aquatine Endodontic Cleanser (Aquatine EC) when used as an endodontic irrigating solution in comparison with 6% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl).Material and MethodsForty-five human teeth were randomly allocated to five treatment groups; the pulp chamber was accessed, cleaned, and shaped by using ProTaper and ProFile rotary instrumentation to an ISO size #40. The teeth were then process… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When used in association with 17% EDTA, they were similarly effective at removing debris and the smear layer from the entire root canal when assessed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and semi‐quantitative visual criteria. If no chelating agents were used, then a large amount of smear layer was present for both irrigants (Garcia et al. 2010).…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…When used in association with 17% EDTA, they were similarly effective at removing debris and the smear layer from the entire root canal when assessed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and semi‐quantitative visual criteria. If no chelating agents were used, then a large amount of smear layer was present for both irrigants (Garcia et al. 2010).…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When used in association with 17% EDTA, they were similarly effective at removing debris and the smear layer from the entire root canal when assessed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and semi-quantitative visual criteria. If no chelating agents were used, then a large amount of smear layer was present for both irrigants (Garcia et al 2010). A different investigation compared a solution denominated 'Anolyte neutral cathodic (ANC)' [pH 7.7 ± 0.5, active chlorine 300 mg L )1 (STEL-10H-120-01)] alone and together with a catholyte solution (not containing chlorine) against 3% NaOCl used to irrigate during root canal preparation.…”
Section: Cleaning Effectivenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The 0.0125% and 0.0250% HOCl revealed similar antibacterial efficacy (> 99.9%) against E. faecalis and S. mutans, when compared with 5.25% NaOCl. Similar outcomes for using HOCl as an endodontic irrigating solution for root canal cleanliness and smear layer removal in the root canals of ex vivo human teeth were verified [31]. In addition, the cytotoxicity of HOCl against pulp cells was mild compared to that of NaOCl solution [32], and this tissue-friendly effect was also confirmed from our study as shown in Figure 1c,d when zebrafish embryos treated with 0.0125% HOCl and 0.0250% HOCl were able to hatch and grow to healthy size when compared with negative control.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Although NaOCl, as endodontic irrigant, has a superior antibacterial efficacy and is accepted as 'gold standard' (Garcia et al 2010), its cytotoxic properties force the Letters in Applied Microbiology 58, 8--15 © 2013 The Society for Applied Microbiology researchers to innovate the current irrigation regimen. Low-temperature atmospheric pressure plasma (LTAPP) is an electrical discharge produced by subjecting one or more gases to electric field, either of constant or alternating amplitude (Moisan et al 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%