Influence of dental metallic artifact from multislice CT in the assessment of simulated mandibular lesions

Abstract

ObjectiveThis study evaluated the influence of metallic dental artifacts on the accuracy of simulated mandibular lesion detection by using multislice technology.Material and MethodsFifteen macerated mandibles were used. Perforations were done simulating bone lesions and the mandibles were subjected to axial 16 rows multislice CT images using 0.5 mm of slice thickness with 0.3 mm interval of reconstruction. Metallic dental restorations were done and the mandibles were subjected again to CT in the same protocol. The images were analyzed to detect simulated lesions in the mandibles, verifying the loci number and if there was any cortical perforation exposing medullar bone. The analysis was performed by two independent examiners using e-film software.ResultsThe samples without artifacts presented better results compared to the gold standard (dried mandible with perforations). In the samples without artifacts, all cortical perforation were identified and 46 loci were detected (of 51) in loci number analysis. Among the samples with artifacts, 12 lesions out of 14 were recognized regarding medullar invasion, and 40 out of 51 concerning loci number. The sensitivity in samples without artifacts was 90% and 100% regarding loci number and medullar invasion, respectively. In samples with artifacts, these values dropped to 78% and 86%, respectively. The presence of metallic restorations affected the sensitivity values of the method, but the difference was not significant (p>0.05).ConclusionAlthough there were differences in the results of samples with and without artifacts, the presence of metallic restoration did not lead to misinterpretation of the final diagnosis. However, the validity of multislice CT imaging in this study was established for detection of simulated mandibular bone lesions.

Detection of horizontal root fracture using four different protocols of cone-beam computed tomography

“…4,5 There are several parameters that may influence the quality of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) examination, such as x-ray beam factors, size of field of view (FOV), detector type, and size of the reconstructed voxels. Variations in parameters associated to differences in CBCT units and imaging protocols in a specific unit may lead to differences in the resolution of images.…”

Evaluation of Root Fracture in endodontically treated Teeth using Cone Beam Computed Tomography

“…These radiopaque and/or metallic filling materials in the CBCT viewing field may generate artifacts in the form of striations or streaks, known as the beam-hardening effect, which could compromise root fracture detection in terms of the sensitivity and specificity of the diagnosis. 13,14 Considering that an early and precise detection of root fractures is of the utmost clinical importance, the aim of this study is to perform an in vitro analysis of root fracture diagnosis in endodontically treated teeth, using two different CBCT machines.…”

CBCT-based evaluation of integrity of cortical sinus close to periapical lesions

“…Another possible reason for the lower image quality could be attributed to the water-filled container, used in the present study, in which the samples were totally immersed when the CBCT scan was performed. 16,26 The water-bearing container was intended to cause beam attenuation, and leveled the values of our in vitro study to clinic levels. Because the CBCT unit used in this study did not allow free manipulation of the parameters, filters and calibration could have caused the images to have a higher level of noise.…”