2009
DOI: 10.1590/s1678-58782009000400001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Underactuated manipulator robot control via H2, H∞, H2/H∞, and µ-synthesis approaches: a comparative study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…178 A H ∞ controller, an integrated H 2 -H ∞ controller, and a μ-synthesis were implemented and compared for controlling a 3-DOF robot in terms of position tracking, in which the μ-synthesis had the best performance, but it requires extra essential computational effort for designing process. 179…”
Section: H ∞ Controllermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…178 A H ∞ controller, an integrated H 2 -H ∞ controller, and a μ-synthesis were implemented and compared for controlling a 3-DOF robot in terms of position tracking, in which the μ-synthesis had the best performance, but it requires extra essential computational effort for designing process. 179…”
Section: H ∞ Controllermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the H∞ control can improve the robustness of the control system, it does not take into account the system's dynamic performance [21,22]. The H2 control method can compensate the deficiency of H∞ control through minimizing the quadratic norm of the transfer function between the input signals and the plant's output signals [23,24]. However, the H2 controller ignores the robustness of the control system [25,26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%