2019
DOI: 10.1590/s1678-3921.pab2019.v54.00694
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic evaluation models for post-weaning weight gain in a multibreed Angus-Nelore population

Abstract: The objective of this work was to identify the most suitable model for the genetic evaluation of post-weaning weight gain in a multibreed Angus-Nelore population. Three models were tested using the Bayesian inference method: traditional animal model (M1), multibreed animal model without (M2) and with segregation (M3). The choice of the best model followed the criteria: number of parameters (Np), deviance information criterion (DIC), conditional predictive ordinate (CPO), and deviance based on Bayes factors. Sp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Spearman's rank-order correlation between the genetics values predicted by the TAM(GHE) and CAM+S(GHE) models, considering all sires in the population, was 0.94. Similar results were reported by PRESTES et al(2019) andOLIVEIRA et al (2010) for post-weaning weight gain in Angus/Nellore populations.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The Spearman's rank-order correlation between the genetics values predicted by the TAM(GHE) and CAM+S(GHE) models, considering all sires in the population, was 0.94. Similar results were reported by PRESTES et al(2019) andOLIVEIRA et al (2010) for post-weaning weight gain in Angus/Nellore populations.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…When testing crossbred models involving the Angus and Nellore breeds, some studies reported superiority of the model without segregation for post-weaning weight gain (OLIVEIRA et al, 2010;PRESTES et al, 2019). However, BIRCHMEIER et al (2002 evaluated Angus-Hereford and Nellore-Hereford populations and found that 11.4% to 16% of the total additive variance for weight at birth was explained by the variance of segregation in F2; they reported that genetic evaluations using the covariance crossbred theory require the estimate of the variance of segregation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, a meta-analysis showed that direct and maternal breed and heterosis effect estimated using crossbreeding study data can supplement the direct prediction in a multibreed evaluation (Williams et al, 2013). Although the multiple-breed evaluation can be an alternative to evaluate YW, to better understand their genetic architecture in the evaluated composite population, this analysis requires a much larger number of variance components to be estimated and it is computationally more complex, besides presenting multicollinearity problems, and thus may be cumbersome for practical applications (Cardoso and Tempelman, 2004;Bueno et al, 2012;Prestes et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%