2017
DOI: 10.1590/s1519-99402017000300007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Replacement of soybean meal with treated castor bean meal in supplements for grazing lambs

Abstract: SUMMARY The objectives of this trial were to evaluate intake and nutrient digestibility, weight gain, and carcass characteristics of grazing lambs supplemented with increasing dietary inclusion of castor bean meal (CBM). Thirty-six Santa Inês-crossed, non-castrated, 120 ± 15 d old lambs (initial BW = 21.8 ± 3.4 kg) were randomly allotted to 1 of 4 dietary treatments. The treatments consisted of 4 levels of soybean meal substitution with lime treated CBM (0, 33, 67, and 100%) on the DM basis. The experimental d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
(20 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The replacement of soybean meal with DCM did not influence the cattle's performance, possibly due to the adequate intake of protein and energy provided by the diets including DCM. Freitas et al (2017) and Araújo et al (2021) also did not observe an effect of including DCM in the supplement on the performance of meat sheep and grazing beef cattle, respectively. In the present study, average daily gain was higher than the 0.50 kg d -1 estimated in the formulation of the diets.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The replacement of soybean meal with DCM did not influence the cattle's performance, possibly due to the adequate intake of protein and energy provided by the diets including DCM. Freitas et al (2017) and Araújo et al (2021) also did not observe an effect of including DCM in the supplement on the performance of meat sheep and grazing beef cattle, respectively. In the present study, average daily gain was higher than the 0.50 kg d -1 estimated in the formulation of the diets.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%