2007
DOI: 10.1590/s1519-69842007000400002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial and temporal variations of Cocconeis placentula var. euglypta (Ehrenb.) 1854 Grunow, 1884 in drift and periphyton

Abstract: Spatial and temporal variations of Cocconeis placentula var. euglypta in drift and periphyton were studied in mountain streams of the Córdoba Province (Argentina). The sampling program was conducted in study sites located on a confluence between different order streams during an annual cycle. Samples were also taken every two hours during the daylight period in high and low water conditions. The relationship between drift and cellular reproduction was evaluated by valve length biometrics analysis. C. placentul… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(14 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Wu et al 2013), which consequently alter the benthic assemblage composition at later successional stages (Schneck et al 2011). Accordingly, in our study we observed strong substrate specific differences, with Cocconeis dominating in the smoother microsubstrate surfaces, where its firmly attachment mode presents a greater resistance to the drag forces of the flow (Gari and Corigliano 2007). Potential differences in substrate availabilities and qualities might be responsible for the observed differences in Cocconeis abundances between channels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…Wu et al 2013), which consequently alter the benthic assemblage composition at later successional stages (Schneck et al 2011). Accordingly, in our study we observed strong substrate specific differences, with Cocconeis dominating in the smoother microsubstrate surfaces, where its firmly attachment mode presents a greater resistance to the drag forces of the flow (Gari and Corigliano 2007). Potential differences in substrate availabilities and qualities might be responsible for the observed differences in Cocconeis abundances between channels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…, Marks and Power ). In a Mediterranean river, C. pediculus as well as Achnanthes minutissimi were common on C. glomerata and co‐occurring macrophytes (Compte and Cazaubon ), and Cocconeis placentula var euglypta was prominent over winter on Argentinian river Cladophora (Gari and Corigliano ), whereas in a Kenyan highland stream, Cladophora supported 60 diatom species, of which Cyclotella meneghiniana and Fragilaria brevistriata were common (Mpawenayo and Mathooko ) and Gomphonema and Synedra species were common on Cladophora from a Thai river (Bergey et al. ).…”
Section: Algal Epiphytes and Associates Of Cladophoramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 a, b, and c). This species of diatoms is a common component of periphyton, and can be scraped off the surface of snail shells by benthic organisms, which feed on epiphytic organisms [26,27] . C. placentula can also be found in the digestive tube of the freshwater snails that feed on periphyton [28] .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%