2004
DOI: 10.1590/s1519-69842004000500012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electroantennography in the study of two stingless bee species (Hymenoptera: meliponini)

Abstract: The first recorded electroantennographic preliminary studies on stingless bees have been performed using two species of Frieseomelitta from Brazil. Experiments with F. silvestrii and F. varia showed that antennae respond to hexane extracts of heads and abdomens of both species and posterior tibia of F. silvestrii (which carry plant resin), as well as to the pure compounds 2-heptanol and 2-nonanol, which occur in the mandibular glands of both species, and to the terpenes alpha-cubebene, humulene, and beta-caryo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(12 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, several studies have demonstrated that terpenes are perceived by insects [62,66]. For example, studying antenna response has demonstrated that many pollinators can detect terpenes, including hawkmoths [66,67], honeybees [68,69], and stingless bees [70,71]. Another study showed that terpenes are emitted from the petals, floral nectaries, stigmas, and anthers of Arabidopsis flowers, which function as both a defensive mechanism against pathogens and also as short-distance attractants for insect pollinators [72].…”
Section: Histochemistrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, several studies have demonstrated that terpenes are perceived by insects [62,66]. For example, studying antenna response has demonstrated that many pollinators can detect terpenes, including hawkmoths [66,67], honeybees [68,69], and stingless bees [70,71]. Another study showed that terpenes are emitted from the petals, floral nectaries, stigmas, and anthers of Arabidopsis flowers, which function as both a defensive mechanism against pathogens and also as short-distance attractants for insect pollinators [72].…”
Section: Histochemistrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, response could be ascribed to the existence of 2-heptanol plus 2-nonanol in the mandibular glands of both bees, and to humulene, β-caryophyllene and α-cubebene, emitted by the tibia and being present in their cerumen. [114] A blend of terpenoids and oxygenated components as well as hydrocarbons was found in the secretions of the bee species Melipona beecheeii. In contrast to the 11 Brazilian species being investigated at that time, 2-heptanol could not be proved in the mandibular gland releases, but on the other hand, increased amounts of oxides were detected.…”
Section: Pheromones Of Beesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two Brazilian Frieseomelitta species F. silvestrii and F. varia both demonstrated that the bees reacted to head and abdominal extracts, to their own extracts as well as to the extracts of the other species, and to the posterior tibia extracts of F. silvestrii . Further, response could be ascribed to the existence of 2‐heptanol plus 2‐nonanol in the mandibular glands of both bees, and to humulene, β ‐caryophyllene and α ‐cubebene, emitted by the tibia and being present in their cerumen …”
Section: Pheromones Of Insectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This compound was previously reported as the major compound in the alarm pheromone of some stingless bees (Schorkopf 2016) Chiral compounds as secondary alcohols play an important role in alarm pheromone communication (Schorkopf et al 2009;Schorkopf et al 2011;Leonhardt 2017). Studies evaluating them have been conducted with some bee species (Patricio et al 2004). For instance, honey bee workers (Apis mellifera ) were able to discriminate between queen-and worker-laid eggs detecting branched hydrocarbon stereoisomers (Katzav- .01 EQ (Kruskal-Wallis H = 1.00, df = 1, P = 0.32), 0.1 EQ (Kruskal-Wallis H = 1.70, df = 1, P = 0.19), 1 EQ (Kruskal-Wallis H = 6.74, df = 1, P < 0.01), 10 EQ (Kruskal-Wallis H = 1.46, df = 1, P = 0.23).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%