After 10 years, how do changes in asset ownership affect the Indicador Econômico Nacional?

Abstract

OBJECTIVEOur main objective was to analyse how the evolution of household assets ownership affected the Indicador Econômico Nacional (IEN – National Wealth index) and to point out the most stable assets and which lost importance more quickly.METHODSWe analysed the trend of the ownership of each IEN variable and the distribution of the households’ scores. We calculated the correlation coefficients of each variable separately with the IEN score and the household income. We also evaluated how the changes of the score distribution over time affected the validity of the published reference cut-points. We used data from consortium surveys conducted every two years from 2002 to 2014 in the city of Pelotas, Brazil.RESULTSAn increase in the educational level of household heads and in the ownership of all IEN assets, except radio and telephone, was observed in the study period. In general, the correlation of the assets with the IEN scores decreased over time. There was an increase in the score, with a consequent increase in the quintiles cut-points, but the distance between these cut-points had no significant variation. Thus, the reference cut-points for Pelotas, quickly became outdated.CONCLUSIONSSome assets showed greatly reduction on its importance for the indicator, and the reference cut-points became obsolete very quickly. It is essential for a standardized wealth (or asset) index with research purposes to be updated frequently, especially the cut-points of reference distribution.

Measuring Socioeconomic Status and Environmental Factors in the SAYCARE Study in South America: Reliability of the Methods

“…In general, these variables are chosen arbitrarily because the selection of the component variables of these indicators lacks a “best practice manual” to improve their discrimination capacity and their stability over time. Another important aspect was recently shown by Ewerling and Barros , which was that the evaluation of socioeconomic indicators varies according to the year of the survey. This study shows that the best assets are those that can discriminate between households and have a high correlation with parental education level or with the household income.…”

Common mental disorders and socioeconomic status in adolescents of ERICA

“…Ewerling et al 21 evaluated the ownership of goods by the Brazilian economic indicator, also common to the Brazilian Criteria of Associação Brasileira de Empresas de Pesquisa, both created as proxy instruments to express the wealth of households. The study used data from biannual surveys conducted in Pelotas (RS) between 2002 and 2014, and only in 2012 there were adolescents.…”

“…In this study, the 5-point criterion was chosen due to its lower error rate for the classification of CMD and excellent validity, with 73% sensitivity, 90% specificity, and 61.2% positive predictive value 19 . The very author of the GHQ showed that the high cutoff point provides greater sensitivity (86.7%), specificity (88.9%), positive predictive value (71.2%), and ROC curve area (0.94) 21 . The score 5 was also used in young people aged 16 and 24 years from a study in India to evaluate the factors associated with CMD 20 .…”

“…Sociodemographic variables constituted exposure: age, race/color, maternal schooling, number of residents per room, number of bathrooms, presence of maid, type of school (public or private), school region (urban or rural), and work with or without remuneration. Given the large percentage of information loss about economic class (around 31%), this variable was not considered in the analyses; therefore, proxy variables about economic condition were weighted, e.g., the presence of maid and number of bathrooms 21 .…”

Mensuração de desigualdades sociais em saúde: conceitos e abordagens metodológicas no contexto brasileiro*

“…30 When it comes to socioeconomic indicators, there is a wide range of options that have been used for studying inequalities. [30][31][32][33][34] Information on personal property and consumption have been considered good options to measure socioeconomic levels, since household and individual income are difficult to measure in a populationbased survey. In this context, socioeconomic indicators based in household goods have been a good alternative, due to the relative feasibility in measuring and comparing the information between different populations in the study.…”