2007
DOI: 10.1590/s1517-83822007000100002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of an in-house and a commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for diagnosis of paratuberculosis

Abstract: An in-house PPA-ELISA was compared to a commercial ELISA using a panel of 108 serum samples. In relation to commercial test, in-house assay presented 100% of sensitivity and 83.5% of specificity and a high concordance (κ> 0.5), which demonstrates that the in-house assay is a valuable tool for use in developing countries.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All sera were tested by an ELISA test developed in our laboratory that uses protoplasmic paratuberculosis antigen (PPA) (8). This assay presented 100% sensitivity and 83.5% specificity, being comparable (κ >0.5) to commercial tests (9). Absorption of bovine sera was performed in three distinct ways: using M. phlei only, M. fortuitum only or a combination of M. phlei and M. fortuitum.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All sera were tested by an ELISA test developed in our laboratory that uses protoplasmic paratuberculosis antigen (PPA) (8). This assay presented 100% sensitivity and 83.5% specificity, being comparable (κ >0.5) to commercial tests (9). Absorption of bovine sera was performed in three distinct ways: using M. phlei only, M. fortuitum only or a combination of M. phlei and M. fortuitum.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%