2015
DOI: 10.1590/s1516-89132015060233
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Skin Doses on the Lens for Temporomandibular Joint Exam in Cone Beam Computed Tomography

Abstract: The aim of this study was to evaluate the kerma at the surface of the lens in TMJ CBCT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…12 Several studies have measured doses absorbed during radiographic TMJ examinations by using thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs). [13][14][15][16][17] In organ dose measurements, TLDs are associated with limited spatial resolution; this is a disadvantage in situations with steep dose gradients. 18 Gafchromic film has been suggested as a more feasible tool for radiation measurements, 12,19,20 but only 1 report has described the use of Gafchromic film in TMJ dosimetry.…”
Section: Statement Of Clinical Relevancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 Several studies have measured doses absorbed during radiographic TMJ examinations by using thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs). [13][14][15][16][17] In organ dose measurements, TLDs are associated with limited spatial resolution; this is a disadvantage in situations with steep dose gradients. 18 Gafchromic film has been suggested as a more feasible tool for radiation measurements, 12,19,20 but only 1 report has described the use of Gafchromic film in TMJ dosimetry.…”
Section: Statement Of Clinical Relevancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, another study showed that the doses absorbed by the lens of the eye were not reduced when a limited FOV for the TMJ was used. These authors also used different devices (CS 9000, Gendex GXCB 500 and i-CAT classic) to obtain different FOVs (16). Comparing the results obtained with different CBCT units creates a bias because factors that differ from one unit to the other, such as energy parameters, may affect the radiation dose.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is unclear whether the use of a smaller FOV reduces radiation dose to patient, since two exposures would be necessary to scan both TMJs. A direct comparison of doses delivered by different FOV sizes for assessment of bilateral structures has not been performed yet, since previous studies compared doses delivered for TMJ exams produced by different devices (15,16). That drawback was secondary to the use of equipment without large FOV settings; since the devices operated with different energy factors, therefore it is not precise to attribute any dose variation to FOV size alone.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%