2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ortho.2017.09.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Association between condylar position and vertical skeletal craniofacial morphology: A cone beam computed tomography study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This might be used to predict the growth patterns and/or growth potential of the mandible in future studies. Previous studies demonstrated that the condyles were positioned more anteriorly in Class II patients whether they had horizontal 4,10,14,27 or vertical 5 skeletal patterns. In this study, PS increased in the Class II skeletal pattern, but this relationship was not statistically significant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This might be used to predict the growth patterns and/or growth potential of the mandible in future studies. Previous studies demonstrated that the condyles were positioned more anteriorly in Class II patients whether they had horizontal 4,10,14,27 or vertical 5 skeletal patterns. In this study, PS increased in the Class II skeletal pattern, but this relationship was not statistically significant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The condyle-fossa relationship has varied according to sagittal and vertical skeletal patterns in several studies. [1][2][3][4][5] This study demonstrated that there were only some differences in condylar position inside the glenoid fossa. The condyle was positioned more inferiorly in hypodivergent than hyperdivergent Class II skeletal patterns (Table 4), which was similar to findings of previous studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations