2011
DOI: 10.1590/s1516-89132011000500009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of gastrointestinal system conditions on adhesion of exopolysaccharide-producing Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus strains to caco-2 cells

Abstract: This study aimed to assess the transit tolerance of potential probiotic dairy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another physiological benefit is that EPS is retained longer in the gastrointestinal tract, so that colonization by the probiotic microorganisms can be enhanced [67]. Consequently, EPS producing probiotic cultures can contribute human health by positively affecting the gut microflora [68]. S. cerevisiae strains, isolated traditional fermented food products, producing exopolysaccharides have been previously reported [43].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another physiological benefit is that EPS is retained longer in the gastrointestinal tract, so that colonization by the probiotic microorganisms can be enhanced [67]. Consequently, EPS producing probiotic cultures can contribute human health by positively affecting the gut microflora [68]. S. cerevisiae strains, isolated traditional fermented food products, producing exopolysaccharides have been previously reported [43].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have reported the effect of the pH in the morphology and viability of different Lactobacillus strains (Hossein Nezhad et al, 2010;Norton et al, 1993;Sanhueza et al, 2015). Moreover, the presence of proteases such as pepsin and trypsin have also been reported to influence not only the viability of different strains of lactobacilli, but also their ability to adherence (Darilmaz et al, 2011).…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adhesins responsible for binding to molecules present on the surface of enterocytes are, for example, collagen binding protein CbsA or fi ronectin binding protein FbpA (Antikainen et al, 2002;Buck et al, 2005). Adhesion to intestinal mucus occurs with the participation of adhesins such as mucin binding proteins (Roos and Jonsson, 2002), or certain polysaccharides associated with the bacterial cell wall or secreted into the external environment (Darilmazl et al, 2011). SpaCBA protein complex forming fi mbriae on the surface of bacterial cells is responsible for the adhesion to both mucus and enterocytes (Kankainen et al, 2009;Reunanen et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%