2010
DOI: 10.1590/s1516-89132010000400002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Culture media selection for mass production of Isaria fumosorosea and Isaria farinosa

Abstract: This work investigated the production of the fungi

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
21
0
10

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(11 reference statements)
1
21
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding the biphasic culture between the different substrates, the production of conidia per gram was maintained in a range of 10 5 to 10 8 and the production obtained showed significant differences between the isolates and also between the substrates used, registering the minimum of 7.60×10 5 conidia g -1 for the grain of birdseed and the maximum of 2.07 × 10 7 conidia g -1 for the grain of rice. These results coincide with those reported by Mascarin et al (2010) for biphasic culture with strains of I. farinosa and I. fumosorosea who report values in a range of 10 7 in different varieties of rice (whole, broken, white) as a substrate and different combinations of liquid media for the pre-inoculum phase. In another study Méndez et al (2009) carried out the production of Nomuraea rileyi by biphasic culture and reported values of 1.68 ×10 10 conidia g -1 , whereas in a study with Lecanicillium lecanii with this same type of culture, values of up to 1.49 × 10 9 conidia g -1 were obtained using combinations of liquid media obtained from agroindustrial waste and by-products and a solid phase prepared with mixtures of cereals and derivatives (RIBEIRO-MACHADO et al, 2010).…”
Section: Final Comparison Of the Conidia Production Of Isaria Fumosorsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Regarding the biphasic culture between the different substrates, the production of conidia per gram was maintained in a range of 10 5 to 10 8 and the production obtained showed significant differences between the isolates and also between the substrates used, registering the minimum of 7.60×10 5 conidia g -1 for the grain of birdseed and the maximum of 2.07 × 10 7 conidia g -1 for the grain of rice. These results coincide with those reported by Mascarin et al (2010) for biphasic culture with strains of I. farinosa and I. fumosorosea who report values in a range of 10 7 in different varieties of rice (whole, broken, white) as a substrate and different combinations of liquid media for the pre-inoculum phase. In another study Méndez et al (2009) carried out the production of Nomuraea rileyi by biphasic culture and reported values of 1.68 ×10 10 conidia g -1 , whereas in a study with Lecanicillium lecanii with this same type of culture, values of up to 1.49 × 10 9 conidia g -1 were obtained using combinations of liquid media obtained from agroindustrial waste and by-products and a solid phase prepared with mixtures of cereals and derivatives (RIBEIRO-MACHADO et al, 2010).…”
Section: Final Comparison Of the Conidia Production Of Isaria Fumosorsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The heterogeneity of the results obtained in the present study with those reported in the literature may be due to several factors among which the technique used for propagation, the nutritional load of the substrate, as well as the capacity of the same isolate to degrade this substrate can be mentioned and multiply. Mascarin et al (2010) and Gao ;Liu et al (2010) mention that an important key aspect to choose a substrate for the production of fungi is to determine its chemical composition with emphasis on its carbon content and the carbon-nitrogen ratio (C: N), because being products or waste with plant origin their nutrients are considerably variable and will depend on the species and varieties of plants, harvest times as well as the farms and / or plots from which this material comes from the nutrients that may be available and this variation can greatly affect the mushroom production parameters, since there are no standard substrates in the market, however, a nutrient analysis for the different substrates, in order to control these variations, is recommended to ensure the quality of the substrates.…”
Section: Final Comparison Of the Conidia Production Of Isaria Fumosormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Por tal motivo, para la producción de conidios se ha evaluado el efecto del tipo de cultivo, la naturaleza de los sustratos y el uso de inductores. Durante la producción de conidios en fermentación líquida (FL) se ha demostrado que las enzimas hidrolíticas pueden ser inducibles (Jiménez-Alejandro, 2016;Motesinos-Matías,2012;Safavi et al, 2007;Campos et al, 2005;Matsumoto et al, 2004) pero en dicho proceso los productos no tienen una alta efectividad para su uso a nivel agrícola; en cambio, los productos derivados de la fermentación sólida (FS) presentan una ventaja con respecto a su viabilidad, debido a la formación de conidios aéreos (López-Sosa, 2017;Mascarin et al, 2010;Lomer et al, 2001). En cuanto a los sustratos que se han utilizado predomina el uso de cereales como arroz y trigo por su amplia disponibilidad y composición química (Villaba, 2009;Méndez, 2010;Gandarilla-Pacheco, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…El ingrediente activo de este hongo son las esporas aéreas producidas a través de un sistema de fermentación bifásica (líquido-sólido) obteniendo concentraciones de esporas con toxicidad satisfactoria en un menor tiempo (Mascarin et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified