2010
DOI: 10.1590/s1516-89132010000200003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coffee Berry Borer Resistance in Coffee Genotypes

Abstract: ABSTRACT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
9
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Other currently available methods, e.g., marker-assisted selection (BERNARDO, 2008) or genome-wide selection (MEUWISSEN et al, 2001), can make the use of wild species with multiple traits of interest feasible, for example of C. eugenioides and C. salvatrix, according to our studies both resistant to bacterial diseases, resistant to leaf-miner (GUERREIRO FILHO et al, 1991) and having a low caffeine content in the endosperm (MAZZAFERA;CARVALHO, 1992). Coffea eugenioides was also resistant to coffee berry borer, Hypothenemus hampei Ferrari (SERA et al, 2010), and in C. salvatrix the seed oil content was high (MAZZAFERA et al, 1998).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Other currently available methods, e.g., marker-assisted selection (BERNARDO, 2008) or genome-wide selection (MEUWISSEN et al, 2001), can make the use of wild species with multiple traits of interest feasible, for example of C. eugenioides and C. salvatrix, according to our studies both resistant to bacterial diseases, resistant to leaf-miner (GUERREIRO FILHO et al, 1991) and having a low caffeine content in the endosperm (MAZZAFERA;CARVALHO, 1992). Coffea eugenioides was also resistant to coffee berry borer, Hypothenemus hampei Ferrari (SERA et al, 2010), and in C. salvatrix the seed oil content was high (MAZZAFERA et al, 1998).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…No food preference was found among H. hampei insects in the selected coffee varieties, agreeing with these results by Sara et al (2010). Targeted studies aiming at the identification of volatiles emitted by different varieties are necessary (BRASSIOLI-MORAES et al, 2019), as they provide significant results to determine the preference of H. hampei for different coffee varieties.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…In this trial the infestation rates differed across sites maybe due to a combination of elevation/microclimate/management and variety. Coffea arabica L. is more tolerant than C. canephoraPierre ex A. Froehner (Robusta) to the CBB,in contractssome studies report higher infestation and CBB populations in robusta [60,61,62], while others report higher numbers in arabica. Coffea arabica L. (var.…”
Section: Discussion:-mentioning
confidence: 99%