2007
DOI: 10.1590/s1516-89132007000300005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Partial resistance to fruit necrosis associated to Colletotrichum spp. among arabic coffee genotypes

Abstract: ABSTRACT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Balady was of the highest tolerance according to the size of the anthracnose lesions initiated on the different fruits. These results were in agreement with reports in different parts of the world (Timmer and Brown, 2000;Peres et al, 2002;Afanador et al, 2003;Sera et al, 2007 andGonçalves-Vidigal et al, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Balady was of the highest tolerance according to the size of the anthracnose lesions initiated on the different fruits. These results were in agreement with reports in different parts of the world (Timmer and Brown, 2000;Peres et al, 2002;Afanador et al, 2003;Sera et al, 2007 andGonçalves-Vidigal et al, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…'IPR 100' presents good level of partial resistance (moderate resistance) to the symptoms of necrosis and mummification of fruits (Sera et al 2005, Sera et al 2007a). These symptoms have been associated with the attack of Colletotrichum spp.…”
Section: Other Traitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, such symptoms are similar in all cashew hosts from different localities, but the isolates of the pathogen may vary in its degree of aggressiveness as well as in its cultural and morphological characters. Species concepts based on morphological criteria are generally broad for the genus Colletotrichum, and wide variations for cultural and morphological characters, pathogenicity and host range have been reported among isolates of C. gloeosporioides (Alahakoon and Brown, 1994;Gonçalves-Vidigal et al 2008;Jeffries et al, 1990;Skipp et al, 1995;Menezes and Hanlin, 1996a, b;Sera et al 2007). Sequence analyses of the intergenic transcribed spacers (ITS 1, ITS 2) and Domains (D1,D2) of large subunit (LSU) ribosomal DNA (rDNA) have been valuable for delineating isolates and species from this genus (Adaskaveg and Hartin, 1997;Forseille, 2007;Freeman et al, 2001;Johnston, 2000;Johnston and Jones, 1997;Moriwaki et al, 2002;Sherriff et al, 1994;Vinnere et al, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%