2011
DOI: 10.1590/s1516-80342011000100013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Expressividade no rádio: a prática fonoaudiológica em questão

Abstract: Purpose: To analyze, based on speech-language pathologists reports, how oral expressiveness has been approached with radio professionals in Brazil. Methods: Six speech-language pathologists experienced in working with radio professionals answered semistructured interviews that were transcribed and categorized according to general performance characteristics and to the expressiveness concept. Categories were illustrated with excerpts of the participants' interviews. Results: Speech-Language Pathology interventi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
7

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
6
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Há necessidades e dificuldades ainda a serem superadas na Fonoaudiologia, referentes às práticas de expressividade, identificadas em estudos anteriores 18,19 : as restrições no emprego da terminologia expressividade, as divergências conceituais e de nomenclaturas dos recursos que a integram, dentre outras que consolidam a idéia de que avanços são necessários, nos modos de se conceber, pensar e trabalhar a expressividade.…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…Há necessidades e dificuldades ainda a serem superadas na Fonoaudiologia, referentes às práticas de expressividade, identificadas em estudos anteriores 18,19 : as restrições no emprego da terminologia expressividade, as divergências conceituais e de nomenclaturas dos recursos que a integram, dentre outras que consolidam a idéia de que avanços são necessários, nos modos de se conceber, pensar e trabalhar a expressividade.…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…Other studies When analyzing the data in the general expressiveness after training, it is noticed that those changes happened mainly in the melodic curve, emphasis and pause (75%). These parameters are considered essential for a good voiceover 3,16 , because they are intimately related to the speaker's communicative intention as well as to the judgement of the listener; they interfere substantially in the differentiation between the professional emission and the spontaneous emission, so that the television reporters look for to develop them, in view of their influence on credibility and clarity aspects 17,18 . This fact is important, because such aspects are the most expected lines in the communication of the telejournalists according to the theoretical framework of the concept of vocal psychodynamic 3,16 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Teaching-learning issues Small groups of participants Principles of andragogy Guided by a voice specialist Terminology used by speech-language pathologists Audiovisual recording of the training Promotion of oral communication consistent with discourse Self-perception and awareness in oral communication Exercises of oral reading and connected speech concepts and practices, making the necessary adjustments to their professional reality and enhancing their work strategies so that the group achieves an even better performance. Finally, since the publication of studies in this area became more frequent, the specialized literature presents a lack of terminology common to speech-language pathologists working with verbal expressivity (10) . This theme deserves further reflection and debate, but it is not the focus of discussion of this study.…”
Section: Concordant Aspects Discordant Aspects Essentially Practical mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Brazil, the work with verbal expressivity is an approach that has permeated the main SLP strategies used to improve the oral communication of voice professionals for many years (10) . Although studies have demonstrated the positive effects of vocal training with promising results (4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9) , the experimental designs, methodologies, and procedures employed differ greatly between them.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%