2011
DOI: 10.1590/s1516-35982011000500022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intake and performance of confined bovine fed fresh or ensilaged sugar cane based diets and corn silage

Abstract: -It was evaluated intake, total apparent digestibility, performance and feeding behavior of bovine fed diets constituted of corn silage, crushed sugar cane given fresh or crushed and given 72 hours after storage, ensilaged sugar cane with or without 1% of calcium oxide and concentrate at the proportion of 1% of the body weight. It was used 35 bovines, distributed in a random block design, with 5 treatments and 6 repetitions. The animals were housed in collective stalls with troughs individualized by electronic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
7
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
3
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other carcass parameters such as RFT and fat were unaffected by CaO application, which is in accordance with the results of Menezes et al. (), who reported no effects of sugarcane silage treatment with CaO (10 g/kg fresh forage) on the carcass traits of finishing feedlot European × Zebu steers.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Other carcass parameters such as RFT and fat were unaffected by CaO application, which is in accordance with the results of Menezes et al. (), who reported no effects of sugarcane silage treatment with CaO (10 g/kg fresh forage) on the carcass traits of finishing feedlot European × Zebu steers.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…As both burning and CaO application accounted for reductions in the DMI of steers for reasons discussed earlier, steers fed burned silage diets containing CaO had BW loss during the adaptation period, as expected. Under some conditions and depending on the diet formulation, more traditional forage sources (e.g., fresh sugarcane and corn and sorghum silages) provide higher growth performance of beef cattle compared with feeding systems based on sugarcane silage because of reduced DMI (Menezes et al., ; Moraes, Valadares Filho, Moraes, & Pina, ; Pinto et al., ). This result might likely be attributed to the intrinsic characteristics of sugarcane silage such as (a) unbalanced chemical composition (low CP, 30–40 g/kg DM; and high NDF concentration, 480–650 g/kg DM; Daniel et al., ; Rabelo et al., ), (b) reduced in vitro fibre and DM digestibility (approximately 320 g/kg and 480 g/kg respectively; Daniel et al., ; Rabelo et al., ) and (c) formation of undesirable end products during fermentation other than ethanol and acetic acid, as neither affects the growth performance of beef cattle and dairy cows (Daniel, Amaral, Goulart, et al., ; Daniel, Amaral, Sá Neto, et al., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Landell et al (2002), the voluntary intake is inversely related to the NDF content of sugarcane and its digestibility. A similar value was observed (Menezes et al, 2011) for the digestibility of dry matter (DDM) of sugarcane in natura (68.08%) and a higher value for silage sugarcane (61.26%) than obtained in this study. There were no differences (P > 0.05) in the digestibility coefficients of the OM, NDF, CP, EE, NFCs, TC, and TDN as shown in Table 3.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Another study (Santos et al, 2011) reported the effect of diet on all intakes measured, except for the intake of ether extract. The animals fed on sugarcane in natura presented greater nutrient intake as well as better dry matter digestibility, ether extract, and TDN content, and a superior performance in relation to the animals fed on ensilaged sugarcane diets (Menezes et al, 2011). The diets based on sugarcane in natura presented a higher (P < 0.05) apparent digestibility of dry matter (DDM).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation