2010
DOI: 10.1590/s1516-35982010001000006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphogenetic and structural characteristics of andropogon grass submitted to different cutting heights

Abstract: -This work was performed aiming to evaluate the morphogenetic and structural characteristics of Andropogon gayanus cv. Planaltina species submitted to three cutting heights (20, 27 and 34 cm). The three cutting heights were allocated in experimental units (12 m 2 ) in a complete randomized block design with three replications. The cuts were done when the light interception by the sward reached 95%. At this moment, the sward height revealed itself constant with values close to 50 cm. The lowest cutting height (… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
17
0
11

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
3
17
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…Given that the criterion for termination of regrowth was the same (95% of light interception), the density of basal tillers did not vary between the post-grazing heights or seasons with an average of 374, 356 and 386 of tillers/m 2 for the post-grazing heights of 30, 50 and 50-30 cm, respectively. Sousa et al (2010), evaluating the Andropogon grass and Sousa et al (2011), evaluating the Xaraes palisade grass subjected to different cutting heights, all performed when the canopy reached 95% of light interception, also reported no changes in density of basal tillers, corroborating, thus, the results obtained in this study.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Given that the criterion for termination of regrowth was the same (95% of light interception), the density of basal tillers did not vary between the post-grazing heights or seasons with an average of 374, 356 and 386 of tillers/m 2 for the post-grazing heights of 30, 50 and 50-30 cm, respectively. Sousa et al (2010), evaluating the Andropogon grass and Sousa et al (2011), evaluating the Xaraes palisade grass subjected to different cutting heights, all performed when the canopy reached 95% of light interception, also reported no changes in density of basal tillers, corroborating, thus, the results obtained in this study.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…However, the severity of defoliation still needs to be adjusted (Sousa et al, 2010;Sousa et al, 2011). When pasture conditions are maintained relatively constant throughout the year, severe grazing promotes a high potential of tissue renewal with high accumulation of leaf blades and effective control of stem accumulation, while lenient grazing results in increased stem accumulation, but in intense use of the pastures during favorable times for plant growth (Difante et al, 2009 a,b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this experiment, the criterion for determining the beginning of grazing was the same in all treatments, i.e., 95% light interception, which does not characterize a condition of intense competition for light, may justify the absence of differences in leaf appearance rate, phyllochron, leaf lifespan, final leaf length, and leaf senescence rate in all post-grazing heights. Studies based on growth and development rates of the plants when 95% of light interception was used do not show differences between the intensities of defoliation tested for the Andropogon grass (Sousa et al, 2010) and Xaraes palisadegrass (Sousa et al, 2011). This shows that the post-grazing heights adopted were adequate for the guinea grass cv.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The use of morphogenesis to study growth and development of plants in sward allows for a better understanding of dynamics responses of the sward to defoliation (Silveira et al, 2010;Sousa et al, 2010Sousa et al, , 2011. In adequate environmental conditions (photoperiod, temperature, humidity and soil fertility), the plants accelerate their growth rhythm, increasing their leaf appearance and elongation rates (Marcelino et al, 2006) and their stem elongation rate (Mazzanti et al, 1994;Difante et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%