2013
DOI: 10.1590/s1516-18462013005000022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evasão dos pacientes nos acompanhamentos nos serviços de saúde auditiva: identificação sobre o motivo e resultados pós-adaptação de aparelho de amplificação sonora individual

Abstract: OBJETIVO: identificar o motivo da ausência no acompanhamento audiológico dos usuários de aparelhos de amplificação sonora individual do Sistema Único de Saúde e analisar o resultado da adaptação do dispositivo nesta população. MÉTODO: entrevista com 27 pacientes faltosos, realizando questões abertas sobre o motivo da ausência no atendimento e aplicação do Questionário Internacional de Aparelho de Amplificação Sonora Individual, para avaliação dos resultados pós-adaptação. A comparação dos resultados pós-adapta… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The limitations of experiment 2 are: (1) selection of a nonprobabilistic sample, justified due to the prevalence of USNHL in childhood in this service, 1.4% 34 ; (2) evasion in audiological follow-ups within the scope of the Public Health System, which in this study was 55%, corroborating with previous research 35 ; (3) reduced sample size of individuals who obtained a neural response in the ear with HL without contralateral masking, which made inferential data analysis impossible.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The limitations of experiment 2 are: (1) selection of a nonprobabilistic sample, justified due to the prevalence of USNHL in childhood in this service, 1.4% 34 ; (2) evasion in audiological follow-ups within the scope of the Public Health System, which in this study was 55%, corroborating with previous research 35 ; (3) reduced sample size of individuals who obtained a neural response in the ear with HL without contralateral masking, which made inferential data analysis impossible.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The reason for attending the consultation reported by more than three-quarters of the sample was follow-up; this result corroborates a study that pursued to analyze the outcome of hearing loss adaptation in adults and the elderly 20 . This study points out that the returns for audiological follow-up are scheduled on the same day of the hearing aid adaptation, thus justifying the large number of people attending the service for this reason.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Of these, most of them reported using the FM System in the classroom. Taking into account the fact that individuals with hearing loss present significant difficulties in understanding speech in noisy situations, as in the case of classrooms, with consequent negative interferences on the learning processes, adherence to the effective use of the FM System becomes and is fundamental to the development of the educational processes of these students (2,13) .…”
Section: Benefit Of the Fm Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%