2012
DOI: 10.1590/s1516-14392012005000072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crack propagation under constant amplitude loading based on an energetic parameters and fractographic analysis

Abstract: The crack propagation behavior in a 2024 T351 Aluminum Alloy under constant amplitude loading has been studied. This study is complemented by quantitative microfractographic observations and energetic analysis. The obtained results under constant amplitude fatigue tests show that different crack propagation stages can be identified and correlated with the evolution of the characteristic features. In another hand, the energetic analysis shows that there is a discontinuous crack growth at low growth rates as aga… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…11. (Crack opening load Pop was measured at the beginning of the horizontal segment on δ' with respect to P diagram [54]. Fig.…”
Section: Evolution Of Energy Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11. (Crack opening load Pop was measured at the beginning of the horizontal segment on δ' with respect to P diagram [54]. Fig.…”
Section: Evolution Of Energy Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The values of parameters 𝐶, 𝑑, and 𝑚, obtained by means of the optimization procedure, are 8.4810 -17 , 2.12, and 3.27, respectively. Importantly, the value derived for 𝑚 falls in the range between 3 and 4 commonly observed for aluminium alloys (Benguediab et al, 2012;Paris & Erdogan, 1963;Sasaki et al, 2008).…”
Section: The Modelmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…The process of crack growth under cyclic loading can in general be divided into three phases: crack initiation, crack propagation, and structural fracture, as schematically illustrated in Fig. 3 (Benguediab et al, 2012). The first stage presents a threshold below which there is no crack growth.…”
Section: The Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%