2009
DOI: 10.1590/s1516-14392009000200005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of the calcium-fluoroaluminosilicate glass prepared by a non-hydrolytic sol-gel route for future dental application as glass ionomer cement

Abstract: Glass ionomer cements are widely employed in dentistry due to their physical, biological and mainly anti-caries properties. Glass ionomers consist of an aluminosilicate glass matrix modified with other elements, and they contain large quantities of fluorine. In this study, we report on the preparation of calcium-fluoroaluminosilicate glasses by a nonhydrolytic sol-gel route as an alternative approach to obtaining alumina-silica matrices. The glass powders were prepared via the non-hydrolytic sol-gel method, by… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(38 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because of its somewhat different stoichiometry, and possibly different surface roughness, the thin film used for the present measurements is characterized interchangeably as “anorthite (II)” or as anorthite‐like (II), while the thin film used for the previous measurements will be referred to as “anorthite (I)” or anorthite‐like (I). For both the earlier [ Hijazi et al ., ] and the present thin films, conventional XRD and GIXRD analysis showed crystallographic signatures only of polycrystalline gold and AT‐cut quartz, but no sharp or even amorphous broadened anorthite lines [ Cestari et al ., ; Le Parc et al ., ]. Therefore, both the earlier and the present thin films are categorized as “glassy.”…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Because of its somewhat different stoichiometry, and possibly different surface roughness, the thin film used for the present measurements is characterized interchangeably as “anorthite (II)” or as anorthite‐like (II), while the thin film used for the previous measurements will be referred to as “anorthite (I)” or anorthite‐like (I). For both the earlier [ Hijazi et al ., ] and the present thin films, conventional XRD and GIXRD analysis showed crystallographic signatures only of polycrystalline gold and AT‐cut quartz, but no sharp or even amorphous broadened anorthite lines [ Cestari et al ., ; Le Parc et al ., ]. Therefore, both the earlier and the present thin films are categorized as “glassy.”…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…3 depicts the thermal analysis of glass A4. The sample underwent an initial mass loss of 33% between 25 and 325 • C, and a total mass loss of 47% up to 1100 • C. The T g observed by DSC and DTA was close to 615 • C; i.e., higher than that of glass A2 (605 • C) and lower than that of A3.3 (620 • C), as expected from the phosphorus concentration [8,11]. Sample A2 has a predominantly amorphous structure.…”
Section: Thermal Analysesmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…The A3.3 material displays an amorphous structure with crystalline phases attributed to fluorapatite (Ca 5 (PO 4 ) 3 OF) and mullite (3Al 2 O 3 2SiO 2 ), according to Gorman and Hill. Sample A4 also presents an amorphous phase and a crystalline phase, which is ascribed to mullite [11,21].…”
Section: Thermal Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations