2013
DOI: 10.1590/s1415-790x2013000400016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of the usability of a nutritional epidemiology computerized system

Abstract: The study showed that the system is easy to be learned and used, but the answers are scattered. The instrument proved to be a useful tool to monitor and evaluate health and dietary intake in epidemiologic studies.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(16 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Few studies have formally tested the usability of online dietary assessment tools. Most of these published studies are generally focused on the description of development and functionalities of the system rather than detailing the methods used to assess the tool [30]. Other studies have only reported users' acceptability with a comparison between using the system and using a traditional method, like YANA [39] and INTAKE24 [12].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Few studies have formally tested the usability of online dietary assessment tools. Most of these published studies are generally focused on the description of development and functionalities of the system rather than detailing the methods used to assess the tool [30]. Other studies have only reported users' acceptability with a comparison between using the system and using a traditional method, like YANA [39] and INTAKE24 [12].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although usability-testing has been used in various developed e-health software, such as smoking websites [28] and online physical activity tools [29], there is limited information published on the usability-testing of online dietary assessment websites [30]. Therefore, this study aims to identify usability and design issues associated with the completion of myfood24 (beta-version) and to determine tool acceptability among adolescents (11-18y) before and after making improvements (beta & live-version).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present study used Poisson regression regularly applied to count outcomes such as the number of food items consumed per day, with logarithmic transformation of the counts and population variance assumed to equal the mean consumption, both of which take into account the peculiarities of the measurement error structure in diet validation (32) . The WebCAAFE presents a different framework from other web-based questionnaires (11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20) mainly because it was formulated as a previous-day recall of frequency of intake of thirty-two food items in each of six daily eating events, so the dietary assessment does not involve a fully quantified 24 h recall of foods and beverages. The cognitive task required for estimating portion size, frequency and averaging may not be compatible with the perceptual and conceptual capacities of children who have not reached the stage of abstract reasoning at approximately 10-11 years of age (26,27,29) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Information technology has reduced the cost of surveying lifestyle factors to a cost lower than traditional paper-and-pencil methods ( 10 ) . Several countries have developed computer-based questionnaires to assess dietary intake and/or physical activity in schoolchildren: the UK ( 11 , 12 ) , Denmark ( 13 ) , Norway ( 14 ) , Belgium ( 15 ) , Portugal ( 16 ) , the USA ( 17 , 18 ) , Canada ( 19 ) and Brazil ( 20 , 21 ) .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Constructed on the basis of expert consultation and expertise, the FIS simulates human reasoning to support decisions based on a given condition 23,24 , such as diagnoses and monitoring in the health area 25,26,27,28,29,30,31 . Construction of the FIS thus involves four principal stages: fuzzification, construction of the rules set, inference, and defuzzification 32 .…”
Section: Development Of the Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%