2008
DOI: 10.1590/s1415-54192008000100010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Análise crítica dos diversos métodos de avaliação e registro das más oclusões

Abstract: Desde o final do século XIX, vários sistemas de classificação tem sido propostos por diversos autores, com a finalidade, inicialmente, de facilitar o diagnóstico e o tratamento ortodôntico e, posteriormente, servir com eficácia e precisão para os estudos epidemiológicos. A classificação de Angle (1899) tornou-se o maior instrumento de medida das más oclusões durante todo o século passado. Por suas limitações, tanto na avaliação das más oclusões nos sentidos vertical e transversal como também pela falta de crit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(30 reference statements)
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…13 Angle's classification feasibility and reliability for epidemiological studies has been questioned because it is a qualitative method and not a malocclusion quantitative index. 27 Despite these factors, over time and in order to overcome the technique limitations, problems such as anterior and posterior crossbite, anterior and posterior open bite and upper and lower crowding, diastemas, individual tooth malposition, overjet and overbite were subjected to additional studies with their own classification criteria. 14 As an example, the DAI could also receive modifications in order to overcome limitations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…13 Angle's classification feasibility and reliability for epidemiological studies has been questioned because it is a qualitative method and not a malocclusion quantitative index. 27 Despite these factors, over time and in order to overcome the technique limitations, problems such as anterior and posterior crossbite, anterior and posterior open bite and upper and lower crowding, diastemas, individual tooth malposition, overjet and overbite were subjected to additional studies with their own classification criteria. 14 As an example, the DAI could also receive modifications in order to overcome limitations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 The publication of the Angle classification in 1899 was a milestone in the development of orthodontics not only to classify the malocclusions, but also to include the first simple and clear definition of normal occlusion of the natural dentition. 27 This method has probably been the most used instrument to record malocclusions until now. 27 The World Health Organization (WHO), concerning to acknowledge the real malocclusion conditions in different countries, advocated the Dental Aesthetic Index (DAI) in the 4 th edition of the Manual of Basic Oral Health Surveys, 22 so that there would be a suitable instrument to gather epidemiological information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Malocclusion is defined as an abnormal relationship between the teeth and the dental arch, which assume an undesirable contact with the elements of the opposite arch (13) . It also comprises all deviations in the normal alignment of the teeth, maxilla, and mandible, such as poor individual position of teeth and osteodental discrepancy (16) . The movement pattern and position of the mandible are determined by dental occlusion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is assumed that the vocal folds abducted during the production of unvoiced fricatives allow a greater volume of airflow to pass through the glottis toward the oral cavity. Conversely, interruptions or malocclusion index 24 . Therefore, this study adopted the "Goslon Yardstick" occlusal index, which allows classification of the severity of malocclusion and the difficulty for its correction in individuals with cleft lip and palate.…”
Section: Considering That Differences Between Fricativesmentioning
confidence: 99%