2003
DOI: 10.1590/s1415-47572003000300008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

QTL affecting body weight in a candidate region of cattle chromosome 5

Abstract: The objective of this work was to identify QTLs for liveweight in a candidate region of bovine chromosome 5. Half-sib families from two lines, one traditional and the other new, of Canchim beef cattle (5/8 Charolais + 3/8 Zebu) were genotyped for four microsatellite markers, including the microsatellite in the IGF-1 (insulin-like growth factor-1) promoter region. Significant differences in allele distribution between the two lines were found for three markers. Interval mapping analyses in this region indicated… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
39
1
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
5
39
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Using the same animals as in the present study in a chromosome scan approach, Machado et al (2003) found evidence indicating the presence of a QTL controlling birth weight and another QTL influencing breeding value for yearling weight in the IGF-1 chromosome region. The most likely positions of those QTLs were at 82.8 cM and 72.9 cM, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Using the same animals as in the present study in a chromosome scan approach, Machado et al (2003) found evidence indicating the presence of a QTL controlling birth weight and another QTL influencing breeding value for yearling weight in the IGF-1 chromosome region. The most likely positions of those QTLs were at 82.8 cM and 72.9 cM, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…The interval flanked by markers DIK4782 and IGF-1 harbors QTL reported for carcass yield (Mizoshita et al, 2004), fat depth and retail product yield (Casas et al, 2000), dressing percentage (Stone et al, 1999;MacNeil and Grosz, 2002), and rib bone and fat (Stone et al, 1999). Quantitative trait loci for growthrelated traits have also been identified in this chromosomal region (Davis et al, 1998;Stone et al, 1999;Kim et al, 2003;Machado et al, 2003). Quantitative trait loci affecting LM area and dressing percentage (Stone et al, 1999) are also coincident with the QTL we found upstream of DIK4782 for total saleable meat proportion and rib lean proportion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We found that most of the microsatellite markers in the population studied were highly polymorphic, as expected by the loci pre-selection based on the MARC database, although this was not the case for marker BM321 which presented only three alleles in our research population. Machado et al (2003b) found that in a 5/8 Charolais 3/8 Zebu crossbred population heterozygosity was between 0.468 and 0.755 (average 0.646) for the four markers used in their research. In our study heterozygosity was between 0.578 and 1.0 (average 0.865) (Table 3), this value being higher than the average heterozygosity obtained with nine microsatellites for the Gyr (0.305) and Holstein (0.339) populations by Machado et al (2003a).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Various studies have produced highly significant evidence for the presence of QTL on chromosome 5 affecting different characteristics such as ovulation rate (Kirkpatrick et al, 2000;Arias and Kirkpatrick, 2004), carcass traits (Stone et al, 1999;Casas et al, 2000;Kim et al, 2003) and birth weight Casas et al, 2002;Li et al, 2002;Machado et al, 2003b;Kim et al, 2003). The insulin-like growth factor 1 gene (igf-1) acting on growth and metabolism maps to chromosome 5.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation