2002
DOI: 10.1590/s1415-47572002000100019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differentiation of mouse embryonic stem cells and their hybrids during embryoid body formation

Abstract: We studied the karyotypes of three hybrid clones of mouse embryonic stem cells and murine splenocytes (two having near diploid and one having near tetraploid chromosome numbers) and the characteristics of their differentiation during the formation of embryoid bodies. The X chromosome originating from embryonic stem cells may be lost in hybrids with a near diploid chromosome number and reprogramming of the "somatic" X may occur. The morphological data we obtained using light and electron microscopy revealed a c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The basement-like membrane that separated the terminal cells from the peripheral cells was an indication of endodermal cell migration (Hoa et al, 2010;Li et al, 2002). This feature was similar to the distinctive outer layer of endodermal cell differentiation reported in day-2 EBs of B 6 D 2 -F 1 (C57BL/6J \ · DBA/2J _) (Tanaka et al, 2006), day-3 EBs derived from HM-1 cells (Mittmann et al, 2002), and mouse cystic EBs formed from the 1E6/2 cell line (Wang et al, 1992).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…The basement-like membrane that separated the terminal cells from the peripheral cells was an indication of endodermal cell migration (Hoa et al, 2010;Li et al, 2002). This feature was similar to the distinctive outer layer of endodermal cell differentiation reported in day-2 EBs of B 6 D 2 -F 1 (C57BL/6J \ · DBA/2J _) (Tanaka et al, 2006), day-3 EBs derived from HM-1 cells (Mittmann et al, 2002), and mouse cystic EBs formed from the 1E6/2 cell line (Wang et al, 1992).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…The cell clumps of varied size correspond to the embryoid bodies that most probably result from cell–cell interaction in stem cell colonies . Such embryoid bodies are usually formed by stem cells as 3D structures, when the intercellular interactions (be it direct contacts between cells or indirect via the ECM) play a dominant role.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[57] The cell clumps of varied size correspond to the embryoid bodies that most probably result from cell-cell interaction in stem cell colonies. [58] Such embryoid bodies are usually formed by stem cells as 3D structures, [59] when the intercellular interactions (be it direct contacts between cells or indirect via the ECM) play a dominant role. The role of these embryoid bodies in in vivo systems is noticeable as precursors, from which spontaneous differentiation of stem cells into a large variety of cell types occurs.…”
Section: Response Of Various Cell Typesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, experiments of other research groups are needed in order to confirm this study. This chapter is focused on critical discussion of the actual achievements on GC and gameteslike in vitro generation from pluripotent stem cells, such as, mES and human embryonic stem (hES) cells (Evans & Kaufman 1981, Martin 1981, Thomson et al, 1998) and reprogrammed cells: induced pluripotent (iPS) cells (Takahashi & Yamanaka 2006) and somatic cell hybrids (Mittmann et al, 2002;Lavagnolli et al, 2009). …”
Section: Fig 2 Gametogenesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8). These reprogrammed near-diploid ES-SCH shows a developmental potential similar to ES cells: they express molecular ES cell markers, present reactivation of the X chromosome, form EB in vitro and produce chimeras with contribution to different tissues (Mittmann et al, 2002;Vasilkova et al, 2007). Our group was the first to show that reprogrammed cells obtained from the fusion of mES cells and mouse splenocyte were also able to undergo GC differentiation in vitro (Lavagnolli et al, 2009).…”
Section: Putative Male and Female Gc And Artificial Gametes Derived Fmentioning
confidence: 99%