2012
DOI: 10.1590/s1415-43662012001000005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variabilidade espacial de cálcio, magnésio, fósforo, potássio no solo e produtividade da pimenta-do-reino

Abstract: A pimenta-do-reino é uma importante fonte de renda para o produtor rural, razão por que é uma espécie predominantemente cultivada por pequenos produtores porém ainda é pouco conhecida a relação da variação espacial dos nutrientes e da produtividade da cultura. Objetivou-se, no presente trabalho, descrever a variabilidade espacial do Ca, Mg, K, P no solo e a produtividade de uma lavoura de pimenta-do-reino, cultivada em um Latossolo Vermelho-Amarelo distrófico. O experimento foi conduzido em uma lavoura de pime… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
3
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The high CVs observed for aluminum can be explained by the non-normal distribution of the data. Similar results were found for H + Al and V in a humic Yellow-Red Latosol , for H + Al and Al in typical dystrophic Red-Yellow Latosol (Santos et al, 2014) and for the productivity of a black pepper crop (Santos et al, 2012 The spatial dependence index was classified as moderate (SDI between 25 and 75%) for the pH, H + Al, T and LN parameters and was classified as strong (SDI < 25%) for Al, V and black pepper productivity. The lower the ratio of the nugget effect relative to the semivariogram sill was, the higher the spatial dependence presented by the studied parameters.…”
Section: Gsupporting
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The high CVs observed for aluminum can be explained by the non-normal distribution of the data. Similar results were found for H + Al and V in a humic Yellow-Red Latosol , for H + Al and Al in typical dystrophic Red-Yellow Latosol (Santos et al, 2014) and for the productivity of a black pepper crop (Santos et al, 2012 The spatial dependence index was classified as moderate (SDI between 25 and 75%) for the pH, H + Al, T and LN parameters and was classified as strong (SDI < 25%) for Al, V and black pepper productivity. The lower the ratio of the nugget effect relative to the semivariogram sill was, the higher the spatial dependence presented by the studied parameters.…”
Section: Gsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Precision agriculture is widely implemented, particularly for soil fertility management. The correlation between productivity maps and soil attributes has allowed for more precise and strategic crop management decisions (Zucoloto et al, 2011) and may decrease the environmental impacts (Gontijo et al, 2012). Therefore, geostatistics is an important tool for analyzing the spatial distribution of soil characteristics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The differences found indicate that the use of different doses of soil amendments, sub-dividing the area into management units, optimizes the use of agricultural inputs and, consequently, increases the crop yield. The definition of soil management units, which represent homogeneous regions regarding soil attributes that affect plant development, is one of the most challenging stages in precision agriculture (Santos et al, 2012). The developed maps denoted, in general, favorable conditions for plant development.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geostatistical studies using semivariograms have shown spatial dependence of soil micronutrients. Kriging is an adequate method to evaluate spatial distribution of the nutrients through mapping, as used by Gontijo et al (2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nesse sentido, a caracterização do solo por meio de seus atributos químicos e físicos apresenta inúmeras aplicações e são estudados com diferentes abordagens, tais como avaliação do efeito da curvatura do terreno sobre a variabilidade espacial de atributos físicos (CAMARGO; MARQUES JÚNIOR; PEREIRA, 2010), variabilidade espacial e planejamento de planos de amostragem (ZANÃO JÚNIOR et al, 2010), relação entre atributos físicos do solo e produtividade de culturas (CHIODEROLI et al, 2012;RODRIGUES et al, 2012;WEIRICH NETO et al, 2006), estudos sobre perda de solo em bacias hidrográficas (SILVA et al, 2008) O uso da Geoestatística implica na definição de um plano de amostragem, para o qual define-se número e espaçamento dos pontos onde as amostras serão coletadas. Na literatura essa definição varia muito, conforme estudos de Alves et al (2011), Santos et al (2012a, Santos et al (2012b), Oliveira Junior et al (2011) e Bottega et al (2013, que usaram 28; 36; 126; 135 e 181 pontos, respectivamente, no estudo de diversos atributos físicos e químicos do solo, tais como: condutividade hidráulica, densidade do solo, porosidade, textura, frações granulométricas areia, argila e silte, teores de cálcio, magnésio e fósforo.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified