Governança das águas no Brasil: conflitos pela apropriação da água e a busca da integração como consenso

Campos, Valéria Nagy de Oliveira; Fracalanza, Ana Paula

doi:10.1590/s1414-753x2010000200010

Cited by 51 publications

(58 citation statements)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The contemporary Brazilian water governance model is a consequence of a process that began between the 1970s and 1980s (Campos and Fracalanza, 2010 to promote the use, control, protection and recuperation of water resources; to guarantee the equilibrium between water offer and demand and to contribute to the integration between actors (ANA 2013).…”

Section: Water Governance In Brazil (Gs6 and Gs10)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Barriers to Climate Adaptation in Urban Areas: The Case of Water Crisis in the Metropolitan Region of São Paulo

Kuss

2017

BJBS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Water Governance In Brazil (Gs6 and Gs10)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Barriers to Climate Adaptation in Urban Areas: The Case of Water Crisis in the Metropolitan Region of São Paulo

Kuss

2017

BJBS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Beyond the instruments provided by the Brazilian Water Law, another important aspect in the Brazilian water's management is related to the representativeness of whose which represents the main organisms that are responsible for decisions making by water resources to ensure representation in these organisms is a mechanisms which helps the promotion of effective governance of water (CAMPOS;FRACALANZA, 2010).…”

Section: Constituent Components Of Context (In) Water Security In Rmrmentioning

confidence: 99%

Water security in the metropolitan region of Rio de Janeiro: contributions to the debate

Santos¹

2016

Ambient. soc.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article aims to contribute to discussions on the management of water resources and the elements associated to water security. The discussion has focused on two main aspects, first, in the theoretical frame about discussions of water security and second, in the presentation of the elements which composes the current scenario of water management in the Metropolitan Region of Rio de Janeiro (RMRJ), based in the discussions about the centrality for Rio de Janeiro's water supply focused in Paraíba do Sul river, and in the role of agencies and organisms associated to water management in this territory. Based in the researching about the water availability and quality in Rio de Janeiro and the mechanisms presents in this State, the elements presented in this article demonstrated a context of water insecurity in RMRJ.

show abstract

“…Initially the agricultural sector was not fully inserted in the charging process. This segment began its participation in 1986 only, when they decided to join the system, almost symbolically, so that they could benefit from the funding policy of the river basin agencies (MARTINS, 2008;BRUN, 2010BRUN, , 2014. Veiga (2007) states that the French decentralization (Portugal) cases study is considered unfinished, because there is always a demand for better conditions for services transferred from the State to the local authorities, as well as overlapping roles are observed mainly related to economic weaknesses that hinder certain communities fulfill their functions.…”

Section: Bulk Water Charge Modelmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…It is possible to see a highlight to the works that focused on two possibilities of analysis on the subject: the discussion about the legitimacy of these water management models and the government's ability to prepare and implement public policies able to meet the demands of society as highlight some authors (CAMPOS, FRACALANZA, 2010;ABERS et al, 2009).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Public participation for bulk water charge: Paraíba River Basin Committee (Brazil) and Alentejo Hydrographic Region Council (Portugal) cases study

Ribeiro

Varanda

2016

RBRH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper proposes to assess the knowledge and dynamics of Committees/Councils in the discussions and deliberations on the raw water charges in Brazil and in Portugal. The comparison is limited to the evaluation of a Committee and Council and not necessarily reflect the operation of other CBHs, in Brazil, or Councils, in Portugal. It was analyzed the minutes of the meetings of the Paraíba River Basin Committee (CBH-PB) and the Alentejo River Basin Council Region (CRH-Alentejo) as well as interviews with members of the two collective bodies. For the Brazilian case, it appears that CBH-PB members discussed and deliberated on the values and mechanisms for raw water charges. In Portugal, the definition of values and the way of application of the raw water charge (TRH) was held at the central level, without the CRH-Alentejo having the opportunity to argue, not fulfilling its role as a consultative body water management. Water Resources Policies have to gain strength by promoting public participation through discussion formats and being able to engage key stakeholders as well as creating conditions for the development of cooperative relations.Keywords: Public participation; Raw water charges; Stakeholders. RESUMONeste trabalho propõe-se avaliar o conhecimento e a dinâmica do Comitê/Conselho nas discussões e deliberações sobre a cobrança pelo uso da água, no Brasil, e sobre a Taxa de Recursos Hídricos (TRH), em Portugal. A comparação se limita à avaliação de um Comitê e um Conselho e não reflete, necessariamente, o funcionamento de outros CBHs (estaduais e federais) e nem de Conselhos. Foram analisadas as atas das reuniões do Comitê da Bacia Hidrográfica do rio Paraíba (CBH-PB) e do Conselho de Recursos Hídricos da Região do Alentejo (CRH-Alentejo) assim como realizadas entrevistas com membros dos dois organismos colegiados. Para o caso brasileiro, verifica-se que os membros do CBH-PB discutiram e deliberaram sobre os valores e mecanismos para a cobrança. Em Portugal, a definição dos valores e a forma de aplicação da TRH foi realizada em nível central, sem que o CRH-Alentejo tenha tido possibilidade de se pronunciar, não cumprindo a sua competência de emitir um parecer sobre a TRH, enquanto órgão consultivo de gestão das águas. Faz-se necessário que as Políticas de Recursos Hídricos sejam reforçadas, promovendo a participação pública através de formatos de discussão capazes de envolver os atores chaves e criando condições para o desenvolvimento de relações de cooperação.Palavras-chave: Participação pública; Cobrança pelo uso da água bruta; Atores sociais.

show abstract

Governança das águas no Brasil: conflitos pela apropriação da água e a busca da integração como consenso

Cited by 51 publications

References 4 publications

Barriers to Climate Adaptation in Urban Areas: The Case of Water Crisis in the Metropolitan Region of São Paulo

Barriers to Climate Adaptation in Urban Areas: The Case of Water Crisis in the Metropolitan Region of São Paulo

Water security in the metropolitan region of Rio de Janeiro: contributions to the debate

Public participation for bulk water charge: Paraíba River Basin Committee (Brazil) and Alentejo Hydrographic Region Council (Portugal) cases study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About