2004
DOI: 10.1590/s1413-86702004000100005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phagocytosis and killing of epidemic methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus by human neutrophils and monocytes

Abstract: Staphylococcus aureus is a pathogen that has been associated with nosocomial infections since the preantibiotic era. Since the introduction of antibiotics in medical practice in the 1940's, methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) strains have been emerging in various parts of the world. In view of the important role of the phagocytic system in the defense against this bacteria, we decided to study phagocytosis by neutrophils and monocytes of an epidemic MRSA strain in São Paulo, Brazil, in comparison with methi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
1
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
4
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The inability of the beta-lactam to follow the organism into the macrophage resulted in recurrent S. aureus infections at sites where such macrophages were common, i.e., bone marrow, etc [12]. Since the 1980's, clinical isolates of S. aureus have become more frequently resistant and shown to have their origins within the hospital itself [13] and more recently, they have been acquired from community sources [14]. At this time, the percentage of beta-lactam resistant clinical isolates of S. aureus (MRSA) has been noted to increase significantly in some hospitals of Denmark, a country known to have the lowest frequency of MRSA, and has reached levels as high as 63% in South Africa [15].…”
Section: The Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inability of the beta-lactam to follow the organism into the macrophage resulted in recurrent S. aureus infections at sites where such macrophages were common, i.e., bone marrow, etc [12]. Since the 1980's, clinical isolates of S. aureus have become more frequently resistant and shown to have their origins within the hospital itself [13] and more recently, they have been acquired from community sources [14]. At this time, the percentage of beta-lactam resistant clinical isolates of S. aureus (MRSA) has been noted to increase significantly in some hospitals of Denmark, a country known to have the lowest frequency of MRSA, and has reached levels as high as 63% in South Africa [15].…”
Section: The Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparative in‐vitro studies of heteroresistant MRSA and non‐heteroresistant MSSA clinical isolates have investigated protein A‐, fibrinogen‐, fibronectin‐, collagen‐ and vitronectin‐binding proteins. The results were not consistent with respect to the frequency and content of these adhesins, either in the MRSA or in the MSSA strains [7–10]. Similarly, the magnitude of binding to epithelial cells and plastic surfaces did not differ significantly between MRSA and MSSA strains [7].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We observed a high lethality rate, increasing of costs and time of hospitalization associated with blood stream infections due to this particular pathogen when compared to infections caused by methicillin susceptible strains (Moreira et al 1998). In addition, we detected in a MRSA-BEC strain a decrease in its phagocytosis and killing by neutrophils and monocytes when compared with the susceptible isolates (Salgado et al 2004). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%