2004
DOI: 10.1590/s1413-82712004000100002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Bateria de Provas de Raciocínio (BPR-5) aplicada a um contexto organizacional

Abstract: O presente estudo relata os resultados de uma pesquisa de estabelecimento de normas para a Bateria de Provas de Raciocínio (BPR-5) e de investigação da relação entre variáveis demográficas e ocupacionais e os desempenhos na referida bateria. As normas foram estabelecidas especificamente para os funcionários do setor elétrico de uma companhia energética de Minas Gerais, por ocasião da reimplantação do processo de avaliação psicológica. A amostra foi composta por 57 funcionários, que possuíam escolaridade de, pe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
3
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
3
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The performance of the up-to-19-year-old group significantly differed from the other age groups, showing a higher score average, and the 20-to 25-year-old group and the 26-year-old or over group were combined, showing lower average scores. This result corroborated the findings by Baumgartl and Nascimento (2004), Colom (2008), Mumaw et al (1984), Rueda and Muniz (2012), Salthouse (1990) and Woodcock (1999), as older adult subjects showed a lower performance on the visuospatial tests than the young adults. It is noteworthy, however, that in each study and sample, different cut-off age values were found for the rising, stability and decline phases of visuospatial reasoning.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The performance of the up-to-19-year-old group significantly differed from the other age groups, showing a higher score average, and the 20-to 25-year-old group and the 26-year-old or over group were combined, showing lower average scores. This result corroborated the findings by Baumgartl and Nascimento (2004), Colom (2008), Mumaw et al (1984), Rueda and Muniz (2012), Salthouse (1990) and Woodcock (1999), as older adult subjects showed a lower performance on the visuospatial tests than the young adults. It is noteworthy, however, that in each study and sample, different cut-off age values were found for the rising, stability and decline phases of visuospatial reasoning.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In this sense, as regards age, authors like Baumgartl and Nascimento (2004), Colom (2008), Mumaw et al (1984) and Woodcock (1999) point out that the development of cognitive abilities followed maturity development in human beings, with both happening with aging until the development apex is reached in adulthood and, posteriorly, these abilities undergo a significant decline due aging natural process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Quanto à validade de construto, a análise fatorial indicou um único fator, indicando que é capaz de avaliar uma única dimensão, ou seja, a inteligência fluída (Gf), o que é coerente com a proposta teórica que embasa o instrumento. Outros estudos de validade foram propostos desde a sua construção agrupando mais informações favoráveis, referentes a esse aspecto (Baumgartl & Nascimento, 2004;Baumgartl & Primi, 2006;Primi & Almeida, 2000;Primi, Bueno, & Muniz, 2006;Primi et al, 2002).…”
Section: Bateria De Prova De Raciocíniounclassified
“…Another factor often linked to the work context is intelligence (G) (e.g., Anglim, Sojo, Ashford, Newman, & Marty, 2019;Baumgartl & Nascimento, 2004;Kulikowski & Orzechowski, 2018;Nguyen, Nham, & Takahashi, 2019;Van Iddekinge, Aguinis, Mackey, & DeOrtentiis, 2017), understood as the "ability to learn from experience, using metacognitive processes to improve learning and the ability to adapt to the environment" (Sternberg, 2008, p. 450). In a psychometric perspective, G is studied based on capabilities and the most current model is that of Cattell-Horn-Carroll or CHC Cognitive abilities (Schneider & McGrew, 2012), which approaches intelligence as multidimensional and with three hierarchical levels.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%