2012
DOI: 10.1590/s1413-78522012000500011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resultados de artroplastia total de joelho com e sem implante de recapeamento (resurfacing) patelar

Abstract: ObjectiveTo study the difference of post-op patellofemoral pain, clunk and crepitus in patients with/without resurfacing at 5 years who had pre-op patellofemoral pain. To study the incidence of post-operative patellofemoral pain, clunk and crepitus following patelloplasty in both the groups.MethodsRetrospective review of 765 patients who had total knee replacement with/without resurfacing.Patients were asked about both pre-operative pain and also post-operative pain 5 years after the operation. Patients were e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 27 publications
(18 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While some studies have shown that the incidence of anterior knee pain and reoperation rate in patients with patellar resurfacing is lower than in patients without patellar resurfacing [ 3 ], complications following patellar replacement such as periprosthetic fracture, avascular necrosis, aseptic loosening, and postoperative infection are higher [ 4 - 6 ]. Studies also demonstrate that the incidence of patellofemoral clunk in the resurfaced group was significantly greater than in the group without patellar resurfacing [ 7 ]. Advocates of leaving the patella alone argue that patellar resurfacing provides no advantages in functional outcomes, reoperation rate, or overall healthcare cost, and is instead linked to more complications [ 8 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While some studies have shown that the incidence of anterior knee pain and reoperation rate in patients with patellar resurfacing is lower than in patients without patellar resurfacing [ 3 ], complications following patellar replacement such as periprosthetic fracture, avascular necrosis, aseptic loosening, and postoperative infection are higher [ 4 - 6 ]. Studies also demonstrate that the incidence of patellofemoral clunk in the resurfaced group was significantly greater than in the group without patellar resurfacing [ 7 ]. Advocates of leaving the patella alone argue that patellar resurfacing provides no advantages in functional outcomes, reoperation rate, or overall healthcare cost, and is instead linked to more complications [ 8 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%