The results of modified MPFL reconstructions are encouraging, with minimal risks of redislocation and an overall patient satisfaction rate of over 80%. These early and medium-term results are comparable with those of other MPFL reconstruction techniques reported in the literature.

Increased lateral stresses may produce a Wiberg type C patella, with a hypoplastic medial facet and a more developed lateral facet. Unbalance between dynamic medial and lateral stabilisers may act as an additional factor. A rehabilitation program aiming to reduce this unbalance may decrease the incidence of type C patella in young patients.

Stiffness is a relatively uncommon complication after total knee arthroplasty. It has been defined as a painful limitation in the range of movement (ROM). Its pathogenesis is still unclear even if some risk factors have been identified. Patient-related conditions may be difficult to treat. Preoperative ROM is the most important risk factor, but an association with diabetes, reflex sympathetic dystrophy, and general pathologies such as juvenile rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis has been demonstrated. Moreover, previous surgery may be an additional cause of an ROM limitation. Postoperative factors include infections, arthrofibrosis, heterotrophic ossifications, and incorrect rehabilitation protocol. Infections represent a challenging problem for the orthopaedic surgeon, and treatment may require long periods of antibiotics administration. However, it is widely accepted that an aggressive rehabilitation protocol is mandatory for a proper ROM recovery and to avoid the onset of arthrofibrosis and heterotrophic ossifications. Finally, surgeryrelated factors represent the most common cause of stiffness; they include errors in soft-tissue balancing, component malpositioning, and incorrect component sizing. Although closed manipulation, arthroscopic and open arthrolysis have been proposed, they may lead to unpredictable results and incomplete ROM recovery. Revision surgery must be proposed in the case of welldocumented surgical errors. These operations are technically demanding and may be associated with high risk of complications; therefore they should be accurately planned and properly performed.

When wound complications occur, prompt management is mandatory. An algorithm for treatment of wound defects is presented, available for both primary and revision knee replacement.

BackgroundGlenohumeral instability is a common problem in young and active patients. Both open and arthroscopic procedures have proven to be effective options. In cases with large bone defects on the glenoid side or on the humeral head or in contact sports, arthroscopy leads to a high risk of recurrence. We report the results of the modified Latarjet procedure in a population of 26 soccer players affected by chronic anterior instability. To our knowledge there are no previous reports on the results of this procedure when used in a homogeneous group of sportsmen.Materials and methodsTwenty-six patients (28 shoulders) were retrospectively reviewed. We analyzed the roles of the players, the levels at which they played, and the average amount of hours that they trained before their injury and after surgery. Moreover, the type of bone loss detected on a preoperative imaging study and its relevance to the patient’s sporting comeback was recorded.ResultsEight-five months after surgery the mean Duplay score was 89.3; most of the players came back to the play at the same sporting level. Ninety-three percent of the patients were happy or very happy with their functional results. One patient underwent a redislocation.ConclusionsOur series is the first in the literature to refer to a homogeneous group of soccer players. According to our results, and other series, the Latarjet procedure seems to be the gold standard in the treatment of chronic anterior instability in patients with large bone defects and in sportsmen playing contact sports.

Modular augmentation may significantly reduce the need for allografting, whose complications appear to limit the long-term success of knee revisions.

Acute patellar dislocation is a common knee injury that occurs most often in adolescents, frequently associated with sporting and physical activities. Patellar re-dislocation after the first episode appears to depend primarily on the medial patellofemoral ligament injury which represents the primary ligamentous restraint, providing about 50-60 % of the restraining force against lateral patellar displacement. Clinically, up to 94-100 % of patients suffer from medial patellofemoral ligament rupture after first-time patellar dislocation. Controversy regarding how patients with first patellar dislocation should be managed still exists. Though most authors have reported good results with the conservative treatment after a first-time dislocation, several circumstances may warrant surgical intervention. A surgical approach would be necessary in the presence of severe cartilage damage or a relevant disruption of the medial stabilizers with subluxation of the patella. In these cases, the repair/reconstruction of medial stabilizers should follow the treatment of the chondral injury. Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction may be a more reliable method of stabilizing the patella than its repair, which has limitations related to the medial patellofemoral ligament injury location. Nowadays, there is no evidence available where osseous abnormalities should be addressed in addition to restoring the medial patellofemoral ligament.

The arthroscopic Latarjet-Bristow procedure is reliable. Outcomes are satisfactory, with less pain and faster recovery in the first postoperative week. However, the procedure is technically demanding, and higher rates of complications and reoperations should be expected. Finally, the arthroscopic operation is much more expensive in terms of implanted materials than the open procedure.