2009
DOI: 10.1590/s1413-78522009000400008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tradução e validação do questionário FAOS - FOOT and ankle outcome score para língua portuguesa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(10 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The function and symptoms of the foot and ankle were assessed using the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS), with a score of >75 points indicating a satisfactory function. 20 The Human Activity Profile (HAP) was used to determine the level of physical activity, with the participants classified in one of the following categories: adjusted score activities (EAA) of >74 = active; between 53<EAA<74 = moderately active and EAA<53=inactive. 21 The performance of activities of daily living (ADL) was assessed using the Katz Scale, 22 considering 6 points as independent, 4 points as moderately dependent and 2 or less points as very dependent.…”
Section: Intrinsic Factors Related To Fallsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The function and symptoms of the foot and ankle were assessed using the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS), with a score of >75 points indicating a satisfactory function. 20 The Human Activity Profile (HAP) was used to determine the level of physical activity, with the participants classified in one of the following categories: adjusted score activities (EAA) of >74 = active; between 53<EAA<74 = moderately active and EAA<53=inactive. 21 The performance of activities of daily living (ADL) was assessed using the Katz Scale, 22 considering 6 points as independent, 4 points as moderately dependent and 2 or less points as very dependent.…”
Section: Intrinsic Factors Related To Fallsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, in the FAOS, the alternatives were displayed in the form of spinners and they were ranked using a Likert scale (0 to 4), as shown in Figure 3 . The total score and the score by subscale in the FAOS were converted to percentages, ranging from 0% to 100% [ 13 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The FAOS was validated in Brazil. It aims to assess pain, symptoms, activities of daily living, and sports/recreation activities in subjects who have a sprained ankle despite the fact that this questionnaire is not specific for this condition [ 13 ]. The questionnaire is completely self-reported and it contains 42 questions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is important considering that an injured plantar fascia may lose its stabilizing function. Conversely, because of the stimulation and strengthening of the muscles, there is a consequent reduction in plantar fascia tension and pain, and an improvement in functional performance and quality of life (20,22,30).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each subscale is normalized so that scores of 0 and 100 represent extreme symptoms and no symptoms, respectively. The intra-rater (ICC = 1.0) and inter-rater reliability (ICC = 0.9) indicated that the FAOS is an excellent measurement tool for assessing functional performance (22).…”
Section: B) Functional Performance Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 98%